DAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 3.09% compared to Dayforce's net margin of 24.04%. Dayforce's return on equity of 1.03% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

Dayforce has a consensus price target of $67.14, signalling upside risk potential of 17.62%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $314.14 which suggests that it could grow by 2.39%. Given that Dayforce has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Dayforce is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Dayforce has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.048% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.788, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.217%.

Dayforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Dayforce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dayforce quarterly revenues are $481.8M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Dayforce's net income of $14.9M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Dayforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.75x while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 31.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dayforce is 5.06x versus 6.59x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of 3.09% compared to Dayforce's net margin of 9.31%. Dayforce's return on equity of 1.03% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 40.52%.

Dayforce has a consensus price target of $67.14, signalling upside risk potential of 17.62%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $336.87 which suggests that it could grow by 15.3%. Given that Dayforce has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Dayforce is more attractive than Autodesk.

Dayforce has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.048% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.009%.

Dayforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dayforce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dayforce quarterly revenues are $481.8M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Dayforce's net income of $14.9M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $152M. Notably, Dayforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.75x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 62.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dayforce is 5.06x versus 9.98x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 3.09% compared to Dayforce's net margin of -4.72%. Dayforce's return on equity of 1.03% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Dayforce has a consensus price target of $67.14, signalling upside risk potential of 17.62%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.48 which suggests that it could grow by 315.49%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Dayforce, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Dayforce.

Dayforce has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.048% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.556, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.648%.

Dayforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dayforce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dayforce quarterly revenues are $481.8M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Dayforce's net income of $14.9M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Dayforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.75x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dayforce is 5.06x versus 0.54x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 3.09% compared to Dayforce's net margin of 36.86%. Dayforce's return on equity of 1.03% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Dayforce has a consensus price target of $67.14, signalling upside risk potential of 17.62%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $513.34 which suggests that it could grow by 8.08%. Given that Dayforce has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Dayforce is more attractive than Microsoft.

Dayforce has a beta of 1.120, which suggesting that the stock is 12.048% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.397%.

Dayforce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Dayforce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dayforce quarterly revenues are $481.8M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Dayforce's net income of $14.9M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Dayforce's price-to-earnings ratio is 356.75x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 36.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dayforce is 5.06x versus 13.14x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.