CTVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Corteva's net margin of -10.69%. Corteva's return on equity of 4.6% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

Corteva has a consensus price target of $73.83, signalling upside risk potential of 0.81%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $8.79 which suggests that it could grow by 24.9%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Corteva.

Corteva has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.779% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.859%.

Corteva has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Corteva pays 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Corteva's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corteva quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Corteva's net income of $652M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, Corteva's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.66x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corteva is 3.01x versus 0.18x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dow has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Corteva's net margin of -2.94%. Corteva's return on equity of 4.6% beat Dow's return on equity of 1.6%.

Corteva has a consensus price target of $73.83, signalling upside risk potential of 0.81%. On the other hand Dow has an analysts' consensus of $35.18 which suggests that it could grow by 31.18%. Given that Dow has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe Dow is more attractive than Corteva.

Corteva has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.779% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dow has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.609%.

Corteva has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Dow offers a yield of 10.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Corteva pays 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Dow pays out 176.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Corteva's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dow's is not.

Corteva quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Dow quarterly revenues of $10.4B. Corteva's net income of $652M is higher than Dow's net income of -$307M. Notably, Corteva's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.66x while Dow's PE ratio is 67.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corteva is 3.01x versus 0.44x for Dow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Corteva's net margin of 1.99%. Corteva's return on equity of 4.6% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

Corteva has a consensus price target of $73.83, signalling upside risk potential of 0.81%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $146.60 which suggests that it could grow by 14.35%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Corteva.

Corteva has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.779% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.393%.

Corteva has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Corteva pays 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corteva quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Corteva's net income of $652M is higher than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, Corteva's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.66x while Nucor's PE ratio is 22.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corteva is 3.01x versus 0.99x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Corteva's net margin of 4.97%. Corteva's return on equity of 4.6% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Corteva has a consensus price target of $73.83, signalling upside risk potential of 0.81%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $147.37 which suggests that it could grow by 14.71%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Corteva, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Corteva.

Corteva has a beta of 0.752, which suggesting that the stock is 24.779% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.919%.

Corteva has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Corteva pays 50.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Corteva quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Corteva's net income of $652M is higher than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Corteva's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.66x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 16.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Corteva is 3.01x versus 1.15x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.