CPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Community Trust Bancorp has a net margin of 20.37% compared to Central Pacific Financial's net margin of 35.28%. Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 11.2% beat Community Trust Bancorp's return on equity of 11.15%.

Central Pacific Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.96%. On the other hand Community Trust Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.95%. Given that Central Pacific Financial has higher upside potential than Community Trust Bancorp, analysts believe Central Pacific Financial is more attractive than Community Trust Bancorp.

Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.177, which suggesting that the stock is 17.679% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Community Trust Bancorp has a beta of 0.656, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.358%.

Central Pacific Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Community Trust Bancorp offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Central Pacific Financial pays 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Community Trust Bancorp pays out 41.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues are $65.3M, which are larger than Community Trust Bancorp quarterly revenues of $62.8M. Central Pacific Financial's net income of $13.3M is lower than Community Trust Bancorp's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Central Pacific Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Community Trust Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Pacific Financial is 3.14x versus 4.09x for Community Trust Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fidelity D & D Bancorp has a net margin of 20.37% compared to Central Pacific Financial's net margin of 24.67%. Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 11.2% beat Fidelity D & D Bancorp's return on equity of 8.12%.

Central Pacific Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.96%. On the other hand Fidelity D & D Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Pacific Financial has higher upside potential than Fidelity D & D Bancorp, analysts believe Central Pacific Financial is more attractive than Fidelity D & D Bancorp.

Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.177, which suggesting that the stock is 17.679% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fidelity D & D Bancorp has a beta of 0.573, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.722%.

Central Pacific Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Fidelity D & D Bancorp offers a yield of 3.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Central Pacific Financial pays 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Fidelity D & D Bancorp pays out 37.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues are $65.3M, which are larger than Fidelity D & D Bancorp quarterly revenues of $20.1M. Central Pacific Financial's net income of $13.3M is higher than Fidelity D & D Bancorp's net income of $5M. Notably, Central Pacific Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Fidelity D & D Bancorp's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Pacific Financial is 3.14x versus 4.12x for Fidelity D & D Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plumas Bancorp has a net margin of 20.37% compared to Central Pacific Financial's net margin of 37.28%. Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 11.2% beat Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3%.

Central Pacific Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.96%. On the other hand Plumas Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.15%. Given that Central Pacific Financial has higher upside potential than Plumas Bancorp, analysts believe Central Pacific Financial is more attractive than Plumas Bancorp.

Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.177, which suggesting that the stock is 17.679% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.064%.

Central Pacific Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Plumas Bancorp offers a yield of 2.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Central Pacific Financial pays 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Plumas Bancorp pays out 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues are $65.3M, which are larger than Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues of $21M. Central Pacific Financial's net income of $13.3M is higher than Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M. Notably, Central Pacific Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while Plumas Bancorp's PE ratio is 10.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Pacific Financial is 3.14x versus 4.69x for Plumas Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First Financial has a net margin of 20.37% compared to Central Pacific Financial's net margin of 14.97%. Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 11.2% beat First Financial's return on equity of 8.31%.

Central Pacific Financial has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.96%. On the other hand First Financial has an analysts' consensus of $51.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.29%. Given that Central Pacific Financial has higher upside potential than First Financial, analysts believe Central Pacific Financial is more attractive than First Financial.

Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.177, which suggesting that the stock is 17.679% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Financial has a beta of 0.500, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.007%.

Central Pacific Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. First Financial offers a yield of 3.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Central Pacific Financial pays 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. First Financial pays out 25.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues are $65.3M, which are larger than First Financial quarterly revenues of $58.4M. Central Pacific Financial's net income of $13.3M is higher than First Financial's net income of $8.7M. Notably, Central Pacific Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.73x while First Financial's PE ratio is 12.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Pacific Financial is 3.14x versus 2.69x for First Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.