CPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

German American Bancorp has a net margin of 26.27% compared to Central Pacific Financial's net margin of 12.92%. Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 10.92% beat German American Bancorp's return on equity of 9.78%.

Central Pacific Financial has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.08%. On the other hand German American Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $45.17 which suggests that it could grow by 10.27%. Given that German American Bancorp has higher upside potential than Central Pacific Financial, analysts believe German American Bancorp is more attractive than Central Pacific Financial.

Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison German American Bancorp has a beta of 0.585, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.455%.

Central Pacific Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. German American Bancorp offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Central Pacific Financial pays 52.69% of its earnings as a dividend. German American Bancorp pays out 38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues are $67.6M, which are smaller than German American Bancorp quarterly revenues of $81.4M. Central Pacific Financial's net income of $17.8M is higher than German American Bancorp's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Central Pacific Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.53x while German American Bancorp's PE ratio is 16.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Pacific Financial is 3.11x versus 5.38x for German American Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Horizon Bancorp (IN) has a net margin of 26.27% compared to Central Pacific Financial's net margin of 35.17%. Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 10.92% beat Horizon Bancorp (IN)'s return on equity of 6.06%.

Central Pacific Financial has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.08%. On the other hand Horizon Bancorp (IN) has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.64%. Given that Horizon Bancorp (IN) has higher upside potential than Central Pacific Financial, analysts believe Horizon Bancorp (IN) is more attractive than Central Pacific Financial.

Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Horizon Bancorp (IN) has a beta of 0.842, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.85%.

Central Pacific Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Horizon Bancorp (IN) offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Central Pacific Financial pays 52.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Horizon Bancorp (IN) pays out 79.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues are $67.6M, which are smaller than Horizon Bancorp (IN) quarterly revenues of $68.1M. Central Pacific Financial's net income of $17.8M is lower than Horizon Bancorp (IN)'s net income of $23.9M. Notably, Central Pacific Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.53x while Horizon Bancorp (IN)'s PE ratio is 15.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Pacific Financial is 3.11x versus 3.43x for Horizon Bancorp (IN). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peoples Financial Services has a net margin of 26.27% compared to Central Pacific Financial's net margin of 33.26%. Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 10.92% beat Peoples Financial Services's return on equity of 4.76%.

Central Pacific Financial has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.08%. On the other hand Peoples Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.59%. Given that Peoples Financial Services has higher upside potential than Central Pacific Financial, analysts believe Peoples Financial Services is more attractive than Central Pacific Financial.

Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peoples Financial Services has a beta of 0.753, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.669%.

Central Pacific Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Peoples Financial Services offers a yield of 4.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Central Pacific Financial pays 52.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Peoples Financial Services pays out 212.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Pacific Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Peoples Financial Services's is not.

Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues are $67.6M, which are larger than Peoples Financial Services quarterly revenues of $45.1M. Central Pacific Financial's net income of $17.8M is higher than Peoples Financial Services's net income of $15M. Notably, Central Pacific Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.53x while Peoples Financial Services's PE ratio is 24.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Pacific Financial is 3.11x versus 3.10x for Peoples Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valley National Bancorp has a net margin of 26.27% compared to Central Pacific Financial's net margin of 22.17%. Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 10.92% beat Valley National Bancorp's return on equity of 5.51%.

Central Pacific Financial has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.08%. On the other hand Valley National Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $10.45 which suggests that it could grow by 8.85%. Given that Valley National Bancorp has higher upside potential than Central Pacific Financial, analysts believe Valley National Bancorp is more attractive than Central Pacific Financial.

Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valley National Bancorp has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.965%.

Central Pacific Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Valley National Bancorp offers a yield of 4.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Central Pacific Financial pays 52.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Valley National Bancorp pays out 65.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues are $67.6M, which are smaller than Valley National Bancorp quarterly revenues of $478.4M. Central Pacific Financial's net income of $17.8M is lower than Valley National Bancorp's net income of $106.1M. Notably, Central Pacific Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.53x while Valley National Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Pacific Financial is 3.11x versus 2.73x for Valley National Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.