PFIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of -9.65% compared to Peoples Financial Services's net margin of 16.32%. Peoples Financial Services's return on equity of 1.66% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Peoples Financial Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.77%. Given that Peoples Financial Services has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Peoples Financial Services is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Peoples Financial Services has a beta of 0.552, which suggesting that the stock is 44.823% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Peoples Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.02%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Peoples Financial Services pays 42.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peoples Financial Services quarterly revenues are $45M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Peoples Financial Services's net income of -$4.3M is lower than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Peoples Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.60x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peoples Financial Services is 3.53x versus 2.88x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hanover Bancorp has a net margin of -9.65% compared to Peoples Financial Services's net margin of 20.75%. Peoples Financial Services's return on equity of 1.66% beat Hanover Bancorp's return on equity of 6.48%.

Peoples Financial Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand Hanover Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $18.50 which suggests that it could grow by 14.04%. Given that Peoples Financial Services has higher upside potential than Hanover Bancorp, analysts believe Peoples Financial Services is more attractive than Hanover Bancorp.

Peoples Financial Services has a beta of 0.552, which suggesting that the stock is 44.823% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hanover Bancorp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Peoples Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.02%. Hanover Bancorp offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Peoples Financial Services pays 42.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Hanover Bancorp pays out 19.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peoples Financial Services quarterly revenues are $45M, which are larger than Hanover Bancorp quarterly revenues of $17.1M. Peoples Financial Services's net income of -$4.3M is lower than Hanover Bancorp's net income of $3.5M. Notably, Peoples Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.60x while Hanover Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peoples Financial Services is 3.53x versus 2.42x for Hanover Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of -9.65% compared to Peoples Financial Services's net margin of 27.77%. Peoples Financial Services's return on equity of 1.66% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Peoples Financial Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.97%. Given that Peoples Financial Services has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Peoples Financial Services is more attractive than Park National.

Peoples Financial Services has a beta of 0.552, which suggesting that the stock is 44.823% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

Peoples Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.02%. Park National offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Peoples Financial Services pays 42.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peoples Financial Services quarterly revenues are $45M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Peoples Financial Services's net income of -$4.3M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Peoples Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.60x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peoples Financial Services is 3.53x versus 5.69x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SB Financial Group has a net margin of -9.65% compared to Peoples Financial Services's net margin of 16.45%. Peoples Financial Services's return on equity of 1.66% beat SB Financial Group's return on equity of 9.47%.

Peoples Financial Services has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand SB Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -20.86%. Given that Peoples Financial Services has higher upside potential than SB Financial Group, analysts believe Peoples Financial Services is more attractive than SB Financial Group.

Peoples Financial Services has a beta of 0.552, which suggesting that the stock is 44.823% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SB Financial Group has a beta of 0.767, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.274%.

Peoples Financial Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.02%. SB Financial Group offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Peoples Financial Services pays 42.58% of its earnings as a dividend. SB Financial Group pays out 29.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Peoples Financial Services quarterly revenues are $45M, which are larger than SB Financial Group quarterly revenues of $14.3M. Peoples Financial Services's net income of -$4.3M is lower than SB Financial Group's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Peoples Financial Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.60x while SB Financial Group's PE ratio is 12.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Peoples Financial Services is 3.53x versus 2.56x for SB Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.