CARR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EVI Industries has a net margin of 7.9% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 1.11%. Carrier Global's return on equity of 41.27% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.46%.

Carrier Global has a consensus price target of $80.74, signalling upside risk potential of 11.47%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of $28.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.2%. Given that EVI Industries has higher upside potential than Carrier Global, analysts believe EVI Industries is more attractive than Carrier Global.

Carrier Global has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of -0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.964%.

Carrier Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Carrier Global pays 11.96% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carrier Global quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $93.5M. Carrier Global's net income of $412M is higher than EVI Industries's net income of $1M. Notably, Carrier Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.44x while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 41.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carrier Global is 2.84x versus 0.70x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

W.W. Grainger has a net margin of 7.9% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 11.12%. Carrier Global's return on equity of 41.27% beat W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 51.62%.

Carrier Global has a consensus price target of $80.74, signalling upside risk potential of 11.47%. On the other hand W.W. Grainger has an analysts' consensus of $1,080.97 which suggests that it could grow by 5.58%. Given that Carrier Global has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe Carrier Global is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

Carrier Global has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.214, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.419%.

Carrier Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. W.W. Grainger offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.26 per share. Carrier Global pays 11.96% of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger pays out 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carrier Global quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Carrier Global's net income of $412M is lower than W.W. Grainger's net income of $479M. Notably, Carrier Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.44x while W.W. Grainger's PE ratio is 26.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carrier Global is 2.84x versus 2.90x for W.W. Grainger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 7.9% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 11.22%. Carrier Global's return on equity of 41.27% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97%.

Carrier Global has a consensus price target of $80.74, signalling upside risk potential of 11.47%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $559.17 which suggests that it could fall by -1.03%. Given that Carrier Global has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Carrier Global is more attractive than Lennox International.

Carrier Global has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.129%.

Carrier Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Carrier Global pays 11.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carrier Global quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Carrier Global's net income of $412M is higher than Lennox International's net income of $120.3M. Notably, Carrier Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.44x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 25.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carrier Global is 2.84x versus 3.77x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watsco has a net margin of 7.9% compared to Carrier Global's net margin of 5.23%. Carrier Global's return on equity of 41.27% beat Watsco's return on equity of 17.32%.

Carrier Global has a consensus price target of $80.74, signalling upside risk potential of 11.47%. On the other hand Watsco has an analysts' consensus of $480.27 which suggests that it could grow by 13.38%. Given that Watsco has higher upside potential than Carrier Global, analysts believe Watsco is more attractive than Carrier Global.

Carrier Global has a beta of 1.326, which suggesting that the stock is 32.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watsco has a beta of 1.059, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.879%.

Carrier Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Watsco offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Carrier Global pays 11.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Watsco pays out 78.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carrier Global quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Watsco quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Carrier Global's net income of $412M is higher than Watsco's net income of $80.1M. Notably, Carrier Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.44x while Watsco's PE ratio is 32.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carrier Global is 2.84x versus 2.11x for Watsco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.