BRDG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Principal Financial Group has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net margin of -7.31%. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's return on equity of 1.45% beat Principal Financial Group's return on equity of -1.82%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.80, signalling upside risk potential of 24.71%. On the other hand Principal Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $88.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.97%. Given that Bridge Investment Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Principal Financial Group, analysts believe Bridge Investment Group Holdings is more attractive than Principal Financial Group.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Principal Financial Group has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.231%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. Principal Financial Group offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.73 per share. Bridge Investment Group Holdings pays -324.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Principal Financial Group pays out 100.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.5M, which are smaller than Principal Financial Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net income of $4.7M is higher than Principal Financial Group's net income of -$220M. Notably, Bridge Investment Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Principal Financial Group's PE ratio is 14.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridge Investment Group Holdings is 1.71x versus 1.31x for Principal Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

P10 has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net margin of 1.89%. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's return on equity of 1.45% beat P10's return on equity of 3.02%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.80, signalling upside risk potential of 24.71%. On the other hand P10 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.66%. Given that Bridge Investment Group Holdings has higher upside potential than P10, analysts believe Bridge Investment Group Holdings is more attractive than P10.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison P10 has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. P10 offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Bridge Investment Group Holdings pays -324.11% of its earnings as a dividend. P10 pays out -215.98% of its earnings as a dividend.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.5M, which are larger than P10 quarterly revenues of $74.2M. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net income of $4.7M is higher than P10's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Bridge Investment Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while P10's PE ratio is 128.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridge Investment Group Holdings is 1.71x versus 5.58x for P10. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEI Investments has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net margin of 28.82%. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's return on equity of 1.45% beat SEI Investments's return on equity of 24.65%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.80, signalling upside risk potential of 24.71%. On the other hand SEI Investments has an analysts' consensus of $80.80 which suggests that it could fall by -4.33%. Given that Bridge Investment Group Holdings has higher upside potential than SEI Investments, analysts believe Bridge Investment Group Holdings is more attractive than SEI Investments.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEI Investments has a beta of 0.983, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.657%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. SEI Investments offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Bridge Investment Group Holdings pays -324.11% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. SEI Investments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.5M, which are smaller than SEI Investments quarterly revenues of $537.4M. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net income of $4.7M is lower than SEI Investments's net income of $154.9M. Notably, Bridge Investment Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SEI Investments's PE ratio is 20.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridge Investment Group Holdings is 1.71x versus 5.43x for SEI Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

T. Rowe Price Group has a net margin of 4.6% compared to Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net margin of 33.77%. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's return on equity of 1.45% beat T. Rowe Price Group's return on equity of 19.72%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a consensus price target of $10.80, signalling upside risk potential of 24.71%. On the other hand T. Rowe Price Group has an analysts' consensus of $115.79 which suggests that it could fall by -1.1%. Given that Bridge Investment Group Holdings has higher upside potential than T. Rowe Price Group, analysts believe Bridge Investment Group Holdings is more attractive than T. Rowe Price Group.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison T. Rowe Price Group has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.235%.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.85%. T. Rowe Price Group offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.24 per share. Bridge Investment Group Holdings pays -324.11% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group pays out 62.71% of its earnings as a dividend. T. Rowe Price Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bridge Investment Group Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.5M, which are smaller than T. Rowe Price Group quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Bridge Investment Group Holdings's net income of $4.7M is lower than T. Rowe Price Group's net income of $603M. Notably, Bridge Investment Group Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while T. Rowe Price Group's PE ratio is 12.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bridge Investment Group Holdings is 1.71x versus 3.79x for T. Rowe Price Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.