BLDR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Vernova has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 3.16%. Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 20.45% beat GE Vernova's return on equity of 19.05%.

Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $139.79, signalling upside risk potential of 19.47%. On the other hand GE Vernova has an analysts' consensus of $453.99 which suggests that it could fall by -12.64%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than GE Vernova.

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.695, which suggesting that the stock is 69.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Builders FirstSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Vernova offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Builders FirstSource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than GE Vernova quarterly revenues of $8B. Builders FirstSource's net income of $96.3M is lower than GE Vernova's net income of $254M. Notably, Builders FirstSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.00x while GE Vernova's PE ratio is 74.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Builders FirstSource is 0.84x versus 4.05x for GE Vernova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 5.45%. Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 20.45% beat Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.44%.

Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $139.79, signalling upside risk potential of 19.47%. On the other hand Huntington Ingalls Industries has an analysts' consensus of $246.26 which suggests that it could grow by 3.19%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.695, which suggesting that the stock is 69.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.286, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.384%.

Builders FirstSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Huntington Ingalls Industries offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Builders FirstSource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays out 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Ingalls Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Builders FirstSource's net income of $96.3M is lower than Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $149M. Notably, Builders FirstSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.00x while Huntington Ingalls Industries's PE ratio is 17.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Builders FirstSource is 0.84x versus 0.82x for Huntington Ingalls Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Howmet Aerospace has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 17.71%. Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 20.45% beat Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 28.27%.

Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $139.79, signalling upside risk potential of 19.47%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $173.80 which suggests that it could fall by -6%. Given that Builders FirstSource has higher upside potential than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe Builders FirstSource is more attractive than Howmet Aerospace.

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.695, which suggesting that the stock is 69.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.907%.

Builders FirstSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Howmet Aerospace offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Builders FirstSource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace pays out 9.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Builders FirstSource's net income of $96.3M is lower than Howmet Aerospace's net income of $344M. Notably, Builders FirstSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.00x while Howmet Aerospace's PE ratio is 60.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Builders FirstSource is 0.84x versus 10.02x for Howmet Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Builders FirstSource's net margin of 2.41%. Builders FirstSource's return on equity of 20.45% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of 4.15%.

Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $139.79, signalling upside risk potential of 19.47%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker has an analysts' consensus of $84.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.91%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker has higher upside potential than Builders FirstSource, analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker is more attractive than Builders FirstSource.

Builders FirstSource has a beta of 1.695, which suggesting that the stock is 69.534% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.16%.

Builders FirstSource has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stanley Black & Decker offers a yield of 4.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Builders FirstSource pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out 166.91% of its earnings as a dividend.

Builders FirstSource quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Builders FirstSource's net income of $96.3M is higher than Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $90.4M. Notably, Builders FirstSource's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.00x while Stanley Black & Decker's PE ratio is 28.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Builders FirstSource is 0.84x versus 0.67x for Stanley Black & Decker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.