AAON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Donaldson has a net margin of 9.1% compared to AAON's net margin of 6.15%. AAON's return on equity of 20.04% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 24.08%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $103.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.61%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $71.60 which suggests that it could grow by 3.23%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Donaldson.

AAON has a beta of 1.030, which suggesting that the stock is 3.048% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 0.996, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.408%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $322.1M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $940.1M. AAON's net income of $29.3M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $57.8M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.55x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 23.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 4.85x versus 2.31x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 9.1% compared to AAON's net margin of -11.58%. AAON's return on equity of 20.04% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $103.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.61%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 70.21%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than AAON, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than AAON.

AAON has a beta of 1.030, which suggesting that the stock is 3.048% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 348.319%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAON's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $322.1M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $6.4M. AAON's net income of $29.3M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.55x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 4.85x versus 2.72x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 9.1% compared to AAON's net margin of 11.22%. AAON's return on equity of 20.04% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $103.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.61%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $559.17 which suggests that it could fall by -1.75%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Lennox International.

AAON has a beta of 1.030, which suggesting that the stock is 3.048% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.129%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $322.1M, which are smaller than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. AAON's net income of $29.3M is lower than Lennox International's net income of $120.3M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.55x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 25.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 4.85x versus 3.79x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 9.1% compared to AAON's net margin of 7.67%. AAON's return on equity of 20.04% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42%.

AAON has a consensus price target of $103.00, signalling upside risk potential of 40.61%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $128.25 which suggests that it could fall by -9.72%. Given that AAON has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe AAON is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

AAON has a beta of 1.030, which suggesting that the stock is 3.048% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.637%.

AAON has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.49%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAON pays 15.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AAON's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAON quarterly revenues are $322.1M, which are larger than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.1M. AAON's net income of $29.3M is higher than Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M. Notably, AAON's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.55x while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 50.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAON is 4.85x versus 3.21x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.