OII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of -0.13%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18% beat Core Laboratories's return on equity of 11.15%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling downside risk potential of -4.3%. On the other hand Core Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $15.60 which suggests that it could grow by 29.25%. Given that Core Laboratories has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Core Laboratories is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.481, which suggesting that the stock is 48.108% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories has a beta of 1.402, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.205%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Laboratories offers a yield of 0.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 5.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than Core Laboratories quarterly revenues of $123.6M. Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M is higher than Core Laboratories's net income of -$154K. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.03x while Core Laboratories's PE ratio is 20.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.80x versus 1.11x for Core Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flotek Industries has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 9.72%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18% beat Flotek Industries's return on equity of 12.95%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling downside risk potential of -4.3%. On the other hand Flotek Industries has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could fall by -15.47%. Given that Flotek Industries has more downside risk than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Oceaneering International is more attractive than Flotek Industries.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.481, which suggesting that the stock is 48.108% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flotek Industries has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.919%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flotek Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flotek Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than Flotek Industries quarterly revenues of $55.4M. Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M is higher than Flotek Industries's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.03x while Flotek Industries's PE ratio is 35.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.80x versus 2.47x for Flotek Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of 3.77%. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56%.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling downside risk potential of -4.3%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $28.93 which suggests that it could grow by 24.75%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.481, which suggesting that the stock is 48.108% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.62%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $204M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.03x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 9.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.80x versus 0.90x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextDecade has a net margin of 7.47% compared to Oceaneering International's net margin of --. Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18% beat NextDecade's return on equity of --.

Oceaneering International has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling downside risk potential of -4.3%. On the other hand NextDecade has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 14.18%. Given that NextDecade has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe NextDecade is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.481, which suggesting that the stock is 48.108% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextDecade has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.079%.

Oceaneering International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextDecade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oceaneering International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextDecade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Oceaneering International quarterly revenues are $674.5M, which are larger than NextDecade quarterly revenues of --. Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M is higher than NextDecade's net income of -$88.8M. Notably, Oceaneering International's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.03x while NextDecade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oceaneering International is 0.80x versus -- for NextDecade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.