BERY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Holdings has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Berry Global Group's net margin of -5.69%. Berry Global Group's return on equity of 15.34% beat Crown Holdings's return on equity of 3.35%.

Berry Global Group has a consensus price target of $74.16, signalling upside risk potential of 13.82%. On the other hand Crown Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $110.45 which suggests that it could grow by 31.95%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Berry Global Group, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Berry Global Group.

Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.488%.

Berry Global Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Crown Holdings offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Berry Global Group pays 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings pays out 25.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berry Global Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Crown Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Berry Global Group's net income of $148M is higher than Crown Holdings's net income of -$175M. Notably, Berry Global Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.84x while Crown Holdings's PE ratio is 103.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Global Group is 0.62x versus 0.85x for Crown Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lear has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Berry Global Group's net margin of 2.43%. Berry Global Group's return on equity of 15.34% beat Lear's return on equity of 10.99%.

Berry Global Group has a consensus price target of $74.16, signalling upside risk potential of 13.82%. On the other hand Lear has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.4%. Given that Lear has higher upside potential than Berry Global Group, analysts believe Lear is more attractive than Berry Global Group.

Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lear has a beta of 1.448, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.755%.

Berry Global Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Lear offers a yield of 3.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Berry Global Group pays 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear pays out 31.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berry Global Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Lear quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Berry Global Group's net income of $148M is higher than Lear's net income of $135.8M. Notably, Berry Global Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.84x while Lear's PE ratio is 10.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Global Group is 0.62x versus 0.23x for Lear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silgan Holdings has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Berry Global Group's net margin of 5.73%. Berry Global Group's return on equity of 15.34% beat Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 15.47%.

Berry Global Group has a consensus price target of $74.16, signalling upside risk potential of 13.82%. On the other hand Silgan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $59.36 which suggests that it could grow by 12.09%. Given that Berry Global Group has higher upside potential than Silgan Holdings, analysts believe Berry Global Group is more attractive than Silgan Holdings.

Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.693, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.729%.

Berry Global Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Silgan Holdings offers a yield of 1.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Berry Global Group pays 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings pays out 24.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berry Global Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Berry Global Group's net income of $148M is higher than Silgan Holdings's net income of $100.1M. Notably, Berry Global Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.84x while Silgan Holdings's PE ratio is 19.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Global Group is 0.62x versus 0.98x for Silgan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Berry Global Group's net margin of 8.61%. Berry Global Group's return on equity of 15.34% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Berry Global Group has a consensus price target of $74.16, signalling upside risk potential of 13.82%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -38.59%. Given that Berry Global Group has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Berry Global Group is more attractive than Tesla.

Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.115, which suggesting that the stock is 11.496% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Berry Global Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Berry Global Group pays 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Global Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berry Global Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Berry Global Group's net income of $148M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Berry Global Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.84x while Tesla's PE ratio is 126.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Global Group is 0.62x versus 16.61x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.