BB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Destiny Media Technologies has a net margin of -4.87% compared to BlackBerry's net margin of -29.65%. BlackBerry's return on equity of -10.69% beat Destiny Media Technologies's return on equity of -6.1%.

BlackBerry has a consensus price target of $4.39, signalling upside risk potential of 7.64%. On the other hand Destiny Media Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BlackBerry has higher upside potential than Destiny Media Technologies, analysts believe BlackBerry is more attractive than Destiny Media Technologies.

BlackBerry has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.981% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Destiny Media Technologies has a beta of 0.783, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.668%.

BlackBerry has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Destiny Media Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BlackBerry pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Destiny Media Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BlackBerry quarterly revenues are $143.9M, which are larger than Destiny Media Technologies quarterly revenues of $1M. BlackBerry's net income of -$7M is lower than Destiny Media Technologies's net income of -$302.1K. Notably, BlackBerry's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Destiny Media Technologies's PE ratio is 88.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackBerry is 4.19x versus 1.27x for Destiny Media Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ehave has a net margin of -4.87% compared to BlackBerry's net margin of --. BlackBerry's return on equity of -10.69% beat Ehave's return on equity of --.

BlackBerry has a consensus price target of $4.39, signalling upside risk potential of 7.64%. On the other hand Ehave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BlackBerry has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe BlackBerry is more attractive than Ehave.

BlackBerry has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.981% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ehave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BlackBerry has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ehave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BlackBerry pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ehave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BlackBerry quarterly revenues are $143.9M, which are larger than Ehave quarterly revenues of --. BlackBerry's net income of -$7M is higher than Ehave's net income of --. Notably, BlackBerry's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ehave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackBerry is 4.19x versus -- for Ehave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LeddarTech Holdings has a net margin of -4.87% compared to BlackBerry's net margin of -6680.99%. BlackBerry's return on equity of -10.69% beat LeddarTech Holdings's return on equity of --.

BlackBerry has a consensus price target of $4.39, signalling upside risk potential of 7.64%. On the other hand LeddarTech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 401.27%. Given that LeddarTech Holdings has higher upside potential than BlackBerry, analysts believe LeddarTech Holdings is more attractive than BlackBerry.

BlackBerry has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.981% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LeddarTech Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BlackBerry has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LeddarTech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BlackBerry pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LeddarTech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BlackBerry quarterly revenues are $143.9M, which are larger than LeddarTech Holdings quarterly revenues of $166.1K. BlackBerry's net income of -$7M is higher than LeddarTech Holdings's net income of -$11.1M. Notably, BlackBerry's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LeddarTech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackBerry is 4.19x versus 15.28x for LeddarTech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ncino has a net margin of -4.87% compared to BlackBerry's net margin of 3.86%. BlackBerry's return on equity of -10.69% beat Ncino's return on equity of -2.71%.

BlackBerry has a consensus price target of $4.39, signalling upside risk potential of 7.64%. On the other hand Ncino has an analysts' consensus of $30.36 which suggests that it could grow by 12.48%. Given that Ncino has higher upside potential than BlackBerry, analysts believe Ncino is more attractive than BlackBerry.

BlackBerry has a beta of 1.450, which suggesting that the stock is 44.981% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ncino has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BlackBerry has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ncino offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BlackBerry pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ncino pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BlackBerry quarterly revenues are $143.9M, which are smaller than Ncino quarterly revenues of $144.1M. BlackBerry's net income of -$7M is lower than Ncino's net income of $5.6M. Notably, BlackBerry's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ncino's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BlackBerry is 4.19x versus 5.61x for Ncino. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.