AZZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Acuity Brands has a net margin of 8.33% compared to AZZ's net margin of 11.21%. AZZ's return on equity of 13.03% beat Acuity Brands's return on equity of 18.95%.

AZZ has a consensus price target of $99.67, signalling upside risk potential of 21.35%. On the other hand Acuity Brands has an analysts' consensus of $336.88 which suggests that it could grow by 9.96%. Given that AZZ has higher upside potential than Acuity Brands, analysts believe AZZ is more attractive than Acuity Brands.

AZZ has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.393% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acuity Brands has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.471%.

AZZ has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Acuity Brands offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. AZZ pays 30.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Acuity Brands pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AZZ quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are smaller than Acuity Brands quarterly revenues of $951.6M. AZZ's net income of $33.6M is lower than Acuity Brands's net income of $106.7M. Notably, AZZ's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.12x while Acuity Brands's PE ratio is 22.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AZZ is 1.44x versus 2.51x for Acuity Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenbrier Companies has a net margin of 8.33% compared to AZZ's net margin of 6.31%. AZZ's return on equity of 13.03% beat Greenbrier Companies's return on equity of 11.9%.

AZZ has a consensus price target of $99.67, signalling upside risk potential of 21.35%. On the other hand Greenbrier Companies has an analysts' consensus of $68.50 which suggests that it could grow by 6.7%. Given that AZZ has higher upside potential than Greenbrier Companies, analysts believe AZZ is more attractive than Greenbrier Companies.

AZZ has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.393% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.543, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.295%.

AZZ has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Greenbrier Companies offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. AZZ pays 30.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbrier Companies pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AZZ quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are smaller than Greenbrier Companies quarterly revenues of $875.9M. AZZ's net income of $33.6M is lower than Greenbrier Companies's net income of $55.3M. Notably, AZZ's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.12x while Greenbrier Companies's PE ratio is 11.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AZZ is 1.44x versus 0.57x for Greenbrier Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hurco Companies has a net margin of 8.33% compared to AZZ's net margin of -2.69%. AZZ's return on equity of 13.03% beat Hurco Companies's return on equity of -7.72%.

AZZ has a consensus price target of $99.67, signalling upside risk potential of 21.35%. On the other hand Hurco Companies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 108.11%. Given that Hurco Companies has higher upside potential than AZZ, analysts believe Hurco Companies is more attractive than AZZ.

AZZ has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.393% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hurco Companies has a beta of 0.430, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.049%.

AZZ has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Hurco Companies offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. AZZ pays 30.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Hurco Companies pays out -12.61% of its earnings as a dividend. AZZ's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AZZ quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are larger than Hurco Companies quarterly revenues of $53.7M. AZZ's net income of $33.6M is higher than Hurco Companies's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, AZZ's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.12x while Hurco Companies's PE ratio is 87.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AZZ is 1.44x versus 0.64x for Hurco Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 8.33% compared to AZZ's net margin of 10.32%. AZZ's return on equity of 13.03% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 14.26%.

AZZ has a consensus price target of $99.67, signalling upside risk potential of 21.35%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $132.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.72%. Given that AZZ has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe AZZ is more attractive than Lindsay.

AZZ has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.393% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.659, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.078%.

AZZ has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.83%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. AZZ pays 30.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AZZ quarterly revenues are $403.7M, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $166.3M. AZZ's net income of $33.6M is higher than Lindsay's net income of $17.2M. Notably, AZZ's price-to-earnings ratio is 55.12x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 20.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AZZ is 1.44x versus 2.28x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.