AYI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products has a net margin of 11.77% compared to Acuity Brands's net margin of --. Acuity Brands's return on equity of 18.49% beat Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products's return on equity of --.

Acuity Brands has a consensus price target of $332.71, signalling upside risk potential of 9.75%. On the other hand Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Acuity Brands has higher upside potential than Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products, analysts believe Acuity Brands is more attractive than Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products.

Acuity Brands has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.307% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products has a beta of -1.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 215.137%.

Acuity Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acuity Brands pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acuity Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acuity Brands quarterly revenues are $968.1M, which are larger than Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products quarterly revenues of --. Acuity Brands's net income of $113.9M is higher than Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products's net income of --. Notably, Acuity Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.56x while Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acuity Brands is 2.48x versus -- for Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enovix has a net margin of 11.77% compared to Acuity Brands's net margin of -522.03%. Acuity Brands's return on equity of 18.49% beat Enovix's return on equity of -112.38%.

Acuity Brands has a consensus price target of $332.71, signalling upside risk potential of 9.75%. On the other hand Enovix has an analysts' consensus of $27.25 which suggests that it could grow by 170.34%. Given that Enovix has higher upside potential than Acuity Brands, analysts believe Enovix is more attractive than Acuity Brands.

Acuity Brands has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.307% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enovix has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Acuity Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Enovix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acuity Brands pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Enovix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acuity Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acuity Brands quarterly revenues are $968.1M, which are larger than Enovix quarterly revenues of $4.3M. Acuity Brands's net income of $113.9M is higher than Enovix's net income of -$22.5M. Notably, Acuity Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.56x while Enovix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acuity Brands is 2.48x versus 82.75x for Enovix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hexcel has a net margin of 11.77% compared to Acuity Brands's net margin of 8.72%. Acuity Brands's return on equity of 18.49% beat Hexcel's return on equity of 6.63%.

Acuity Brands has a consensus price target of $332.71, signalling upside risk potential of 9.75%. On the other hand Hexcel has an analysts' consensus of $69.71 which suggests that it could grow by 10.99%. Given that Hexcel has higher upside potential than Acuity Brands, analysts believe Hexcel is more attractive than Acuity Brands.

Acuity Brands has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.307% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hexcel has a beta of 1.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.933%.

Acuity Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Hexcel offers a yield of 0.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Acuity Brands pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Hexcel pays out 39.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acuity Brands quarterly revenues are $968.1M, which are larger than Hexcel quarterly revenues of $456.5M. Acuity Brands's net income of $113.9M is higher than Hexcel's net income of $39.8M. Notably, Acuity Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.56x while Hexcel's PE ratio is 47.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acuity Brands is 2.48x versus 2.79x for Hexcel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NeoVolta has a net margin of 11.77% compared to Acuity Brands's net margin of -163.41%. Acuity Brands's return on equity of 18.49% beat NeoVolta's return on equity of -55.85%.

Acuity Brands has a consensus price target of $332.71, signalling upside risk potential of 9.75%. On the other hand NeoVolta has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 58.23%. Given that NeoVolta has higher upside potential than Acuity Brands, analysts believe NeoVolta is more attractive than Acuity Brands.

Acuity Brands has a beta of 1.393, which suggesting that the stock is 39.307% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NeoVolta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Acuity Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. NeoVolta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acuity Brands pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. NeoVolta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acuity Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acuity Brands quarterly revenues are $968.1M, which are larger than NeoVolta quarterly revenues of $590.2K. Acuity Brands's net income of $113.9M is higher than NeoVolta's net income of -$964.5K. Notably, Acuity Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.56x while NeoVolta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acuity Brands is 2.48x versus 63.75x for NeoVolta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.