AIR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of -1.31% compared to AAR's net margin of -0.19%. AAR's return on equity of -1.05% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

AAR has a consensus price target of $80.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.14%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $232.82 which suggests that it could grow by 1%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Boeing, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Boeing.

AAR has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 44.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.406, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.564%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AAR quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $19.5B. AAR's net income of -$8.9M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$37M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 244.11x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.99x versus 2.26x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Dynamics has a net margin of -1.31% compared to AAR's net margin of 8.13%. AAR's return on equity of -1.05% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96%.

AAR has a consensus price target of $80.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.14%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $302.31 which suggests that it could fall by -0.83%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than General Dynamics.

AAR has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 44.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.462%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 1.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAR quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $12.2B. AAR's net income of -$8.9M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $994M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 244.11x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 21.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.99x versus 1.72x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of -1.31% compared to AAR's net margin of 19.91%. AAR's return on equity of -1.05% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

AAR has a consensus price target of $80.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.14%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $259.95 which suggests that it could fall by -0.91%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

AAR has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 44.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.616%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AAR quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. AAR's net income of -$8.9M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 244.11x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 40.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.99x versus 7.20x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Group has a net margin of -1.31% compared to AAR's net margin of 7.54%. AAR's return on equity of -1.05% beat Triumph Group's return on equity of --.

AAR has a consensus price target of $80.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.14%. On the other hand Triumph Group has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.39%. Given that AAR has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe AAR is more attractive than Triumph Group.

AAR has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 44.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Group has a beta of 2.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 137.834%.

AAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triumph Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AAR pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AAR quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are larger than Triumph Group quarterly revenues of $377.9M. AAR's net income of -$8.9M is lower than Triumph Group's net income of $28.5M. Notably, AAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 244.11x while Triumph Group's PE ratio is 49.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AAR is 0.99x versus 1.60x for Triumph Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.