BWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor has a net margin of 4.47% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 1.16%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 11.39%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $37.52, signalling upside risk potential of 16.99%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.37 which suggests that it could grow by 1.29%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Ford Motor.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.843%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 7.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $40.7B. BorgWarner's net income of $157M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $471M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.70x while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 8.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.51x versus 0.23x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Holley has a net margin of 4.47% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 1.84%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77% beat Holley's return on equity of -5.46%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $37.52, signalling upside risk potential of 16.99%. On the other hand Holley has an analysts' consensus of $3.54 which suggests that it could grow by 61.03%. Given that Holley has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Holley is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holley has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Holley offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Holley pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Holley quarterly revenues of $153M. BorgWarner's net income of $157M is higher than Holley's net income of $2.8M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.70x while Holley's PE ratio is 22.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.51x versus 0.41x for Holley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lear has a net margin of 4.47% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 1.45%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77% beat Lear's return on equity of 9.86%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $37.52, signalling upside risk potential of 16.99%. On the other hand Lear has an analysts' consensus of $103.08 which suggests that it could grow by 15.33%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Lear, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Lear.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lear has a beta of 1.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.016%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Lear offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear pays out 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Lear quarterly revenues of $5.6B. BorgWarner's net income of $157M is higher than Lear's net income of $80.7M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.70x while Lear's PE ratio is 10.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.51x versus 0.22x for Lear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of 4.47% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 6.96%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77% beat Visteon's return on equity of 23.53%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $37.52, signalling upside risk potential of 16.99%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $94.08 which suggests that it could grow by 11.92%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Visteon.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.195, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.454%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Visteon quarterly revenues of $934M. BorgWarner's net income of $157M is higher than Visteon's net income of $65M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.70x while Visteon's PE ratio is 7.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.51x versus 0.60x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.