BWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Axle & Mfg Holdings has a net margin of 4.47% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 0.5%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77% beat American Axle & Mfg Holdings's return on equity of 3.59%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $38.15, signalling upside risk potential of 14.34%. On the other hand American Axle & Mfg Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.20 which suggests that it could grow by 20.37%. Given that American Axle & Mfg Holdings has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe American Axle & Mfg Holdings is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Axle & Mfg Holdings has a beta of 1.582, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.173%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. American Axle & Mfg Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. American Axle & Mfg Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than American Axle & Mfg Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. BorgWarner's net income of $157M is higher than American Axle & Mfg Holdings's net income of $7.1M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.73x while American Axle & Mfg Holdings's PE ratio is 25.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.53x versus 0.09x for American Axle & Mfg Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Holley has a net margin of 4.47% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 1.84%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77% beat Holley's return on equity of -5.46%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $38.15, signalling upside risk potential of 14.34%. On the other hand Holley has an analysts' consensus of $3.54 which suggests that it could grow by 59.49%. Given that Holley has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Holley is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holley has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Holley offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Holley pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Holley quarterly revenues of $153M. BorgWarner's net income of $157M is higher than Holley's net income of $2.8M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.73x while Holley's PE ratio is 22.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.53x versus 0.42x for Holley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lear has a net margin of 4.47% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 1.45%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77% beat Lear's return on equity of 9.86%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $38.15, signalling upside risk potential of 14.34%. On the other hand Lear has an analysts' consensus of $103.46 which suggests that it could grow by 11.76%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Lear, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Lear.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lear has a beta of 1.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.016%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Lear offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Lear pays out 34.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Lear quarterly revenues of $5.6B. BorgWarner's net income of $157M is higher than Lear's net income of $80.7M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.73x while Lear's PE ratio is 10.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.53x versus 0.23x for Lear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of 4.47% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 6.96%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77% beat Visteon's return on equity of 23.53%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $38.15, signalling upside risk potential of 14.34%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $93.08 which suggests that it could grow by 0.47%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Visteon.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.103, which suggesting that the stock is 10.254% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.195, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.454%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Visteon quarterly revenues of $934M. BorgWarner's net income of $157M is higher than Visteon's net income of $65M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.73x while Visteon's PE ratio is 8.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.53x versus 0.67x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.