AGCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of 0.51% compared to AGCO's net margin of -149.77%. AGCO's return on equity of -13.26% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -33%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $107.04, signalling upside risk potential of 5.43%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AGCO has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe AGCO is more attractive than CEA Industries.

AGCO has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.446% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.522%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $713.5K. AGCO's net income of $10.5M is higher than CEA Industries's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.70x versus 1.93x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNH Industrial NV has a net margin of 0.51% compared to AGCO's net margin of 3.42%. AGCO's return on equity of -13.26% beat CNH Industrial NV's return on equity of 13.31%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $107.04, signalling upside risk potential of 5.43%. On the other hand CNH Industrial NV has an analysts' consensus of $14.90 which suggests that it could grow by 17.79%. Given that CNH Industrial NV has higher upside potential than AGCO, analysts believe CNH Industrial NV is more attractive than AGCO.

AGCO has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.446% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNH Industrial NV has a beta of 1.570, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.957%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. CNH Industrial NV offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. CNH Industrial NV pays out 48.72% of its earnings as a dividend. CNH Industrial NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than CNH Industrial NV quarterly revenues of $3.8B. AGCO's net income of $10.5M is lower than CNH Industrial NV's net income of $131M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while CNH Industrial NV's PE ratio is 15.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.70x versus 0.84x for CNH Industrial NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 0.51% compared to AGCO's net margin of 14.4%. AGCO's return on equity of -13.26% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 24.4%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $107.04, signalling upside risk potential of 5.43%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $537.44 which suggests that it could grow by 6.75%. Given that Deere & has higher upside potential than AGCO, analysts believe Deere & is more attractive than AGCO.

AGCO has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.446% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.085, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.499%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $12.5B. AGCO's net income of $10.5M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 24.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.70x versus 3.10x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 0.51% compared to AGCO's net margin of 14.21%. AGCO's return on equity of -13.26% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.69%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $107.04, signalling upside risk potential of 5.43%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $139.00 which suggests that it could fall by -1.24%. Given that AGCO has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe AGCO is more attractive than Lindsay.

AGCO has a beta of 1.204, which suggesting that the stock is 20.446% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.975%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.14%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $187.1M. AGCO's net income of $10.5M is lower than Lindsay's net income of $26.6M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 20.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.70x versus 2.38x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.