AGCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CNH Industrial NV has a net margin of 0.51% compared to AGCO's net margin of 3.42%. AGCO's return on equity of -13.26% beat CNH Industrial NV's return on equity of 13.31%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $107.04, signalling upside risk potential of 6.41%. On the other hand CNH Industrial NV has an analysts' consensus of $15.04 which suggests that it could grow by 19.63%. Given that CNH Industrial NV has higher upside potential than AGCO, analysts believe CNH Industrial NV is more attractive than AGCO.

AGCO has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.832% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNH Industrial NV has a beta of 1.595, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.483%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. CNH Industrial NV offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. CNH Industrial NV pays out 48.72% of its earnings as a dividend. CNH Industrial NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than CNH Industrial NV quarterly revenues of $3.8B. AGCO's net income of $10.5M is lower than CNH Industrial NV's net income of $131M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while CNH Industrial NV's PE ratio is 15.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.70x versus 0.84x for CNH Industrial NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of 0.51% compared to AGCO's net margin of 14.4%. AGCO's return on equity of -13.26% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 24.4%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $107.04, signalling upside risk potential of 6.41%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $547.33 which suggests that it could grow by 7.41%. Given that Deere & has higher upside potential than AGCO, analysts believe Deere & is more attractive than AGCO.

AGCO has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.832% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.375%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $12.5B. AGCO's net income of $10.5M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 24.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.70x versus 3.13x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 0.51% compared to AGCO's net margin of 14.21%. AGCO's return on equity of -13.26% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.69%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $107.04, signalling upside risk potential of 6.41%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $139.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.56%. Given that AGCO has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe AGCO is more attractive than Lindsay.

AGCO has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.832% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.982%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $187.1M. AGCO's net income of $10.5M is lower than Lindsay's net income of $26.6M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 19.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.70x versus 2.27x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan International has a net margin of 0.51% compared to AGCO's net margin of -0.13%. AGCO's return on equity of -13.26% beat Titan International's return on equity of -2.68%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $107.04, signalling upside risk potential of 6.41%. On the other hand Titan International has an analysts' consensus of $11.60 which suggests that it could grow by 27.61%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than AGCO, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than AGCO.

AGCO has a beta of 1.238, which suggesting that the stock is 23.832% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan International has a beta of 1.953, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.296%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.15%. Titan International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AGCO pays -64.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Titan International quarterly revenues of $490.7M. AGCO's net income of $10.5M is higher than Titan International's net income of -$649K. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.40x while Titan International's PE ratio is 18.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.70x versus 0.33x for Titan International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.