AGCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deere & has a net margin of 1.15% compared to AGCO's net margin of 11.5%. AGCO's return on equity of 3.72% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 31.44%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $104.38, signalling upside risk potential of 11.02%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $464.48 which suggests that it could grow by 7.31%. Given that AGCO has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe AGCO is more attractive than Deere &.

AGCO has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.598% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.711%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.47 per share. AGCO pays 39.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $10.8B. AGCO's net income of $30M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.60x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 16.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.56x versus 2.37x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 1.15% compared to AGCO's net margin of 14.64%. AGCO's return on equity of 3.72% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.66%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $104.38, signalling upside risk potential of 11.02%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $132.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.78%. Given that AGCO has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe AGCO is more attractive than Lindsay.

AGCO has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.598% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.754%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. AGCO pays 39.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $139.2M. AGCO's net income of $30M is higher than Lindsay's net income of $20.4M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.60x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 20.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.56x versus 2.22x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Toro has a net margin of 1.15% compared to AGCO's net margin of 8.36%. AGCO's return on equity of 3.72% beat The Toro's return on equity of 26.52%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $104.38, signalling upside risk potential of 11.02%. On the other hand The Toro has an analysts' consensus of $93.20 which suggests that it could grow by 15.28%. Given that The Toro has higher upside potential than AGCO, analysts believe The Toro is more attractive than AGCO.

AGCO has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.598% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Toro has a beta of 0.705, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.522%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. The Toro offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. AGCO pays 39.05% of its earnings as a dividend. The Toro pays out 35.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than The Toro quarterly revenues of $1.1B. AGCO's net income of $30M is lower than The Toro's net income of $89.9M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.60x while The Toro's PE ratio is 20.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.56x versus 1.84x for The Toro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Titan International has a net margin of 1.15% compared to AGCO's net margin of -4.07%. AGCO's return on equity of 3.72% beat Titan International's return on equity of -1.73%.

AGCO has a consensus price target of $104.38, signalling upside risk potential of 11.02%. On the other hand Titan International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 71.67%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than AGCO, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than AGCO.

AGCO has a beta of 1.236, which suggesting that the stock is 23.598% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Titan International has a beta of 1.827, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.744%.

AGCO has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.23%. Titan International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AGCO pays 39.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Titan International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. AGCO's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AGCO quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Titan International quarterly revenues of $448M. AGCO's net income of $30M is higher than Titan International's net income of -$18.2M. Notably, AGCO's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.60x while Titan International's PE ratio is 17.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AGCO is 0.56x versus 0.26x for Titan International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.