TWI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CEA Industries has a net margin of -0.13% compared to Titan International's net margin of -149.77%. Titan International's return on equity of -2.68% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -33%.

Titan International has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 62.29%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Titan International has a beta of 1.950, which suggesting that the stock is 94.977% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.835, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.522%.

Titan International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Titan International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Titan International quarterly revenues are $490.7M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $713.5K. Titan International's net income of -$649K is higher than CEA Industries's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Titan International's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.93x while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Titan International is 0.27x versus 1.90x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Deere & has a net margin of -0.13% compared to Titan International's net margin of 14.4%. Titan International's return on equity of -2.68% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 24.4%.

Titan International has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 62.29%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $536.30 which suggests that it could grow by 5.93%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than Deere &.

Titan International has a beta of 1.950, which suggesting that the stock is 94.977% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 1.085, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.499%.

Titan International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Titan International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Titan International quarterly revenues are $490.7M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $12.5B. Titan International's net income of -$649K is lower than Deere &'s net income of $1.8B. Notably, Titan International's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.93x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 24.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Titan International is 0.27x versus 3.11x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of -0.13% compared to Titan International's net margin of 14.21%. Titan International's return on equity of -2.68% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.69%.

Titan International has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 62.29%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $139.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.29%. Given that Titan International has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Titan International is more attractive than Lindsay.

Titan International has a beta of 1.950, which suggesting that the stock is 94.977% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.810, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.975%.

Titan International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Titan International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Titan International quarterly revenues are $490.7M, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $187.1M. Titan International's net income of -$649K is lower than Lindsay's net income of $26.6M. Notably, Titan International's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.93x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 19.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Titan International is 0.27x versus 2.35x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of -0.13% compared to Titan International's net margin of -13.78%. Titan International's return on equity of -2.68% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Titan International has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 62.29%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of $2.77 which suggests that it could grow by 714.45%. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than Titan International, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than Titan International.

Titan International has a beta of 1.950, which suggesting that the stock is 94.977% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.597%.

Titan International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Titan International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Titan International quarterly revenues are $490.7M, which are larger than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Titan International's net income of -$649K is higher than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Titan International's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.93x while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Titan International is 0.27x versus 0.07x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.