VSAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BK Technologies has a net margin of -21.45% compared to Viasat's net margin of 11.19%. Viasat's return on equity of -11.66% beat BK Technologies's return on equity of 36.85%.

Viasat has a consensus price target of $18.29, signalling upside risk potential of 23.47%. On the other hand BK Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.87%. Given that Viasat has higher upside potential than BK Technologies, analysts believe Viasat is more attractive than BK Technologies.

Viasat has a beta of 1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 17.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BK Technologies has a beta of 0.321, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.873%.

Viasat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BK Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viasat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BK Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viasat quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than BK Technologies quarterly revenues of $19.1M. Viasat's net income of -$246.1M is lower than BK Technologies's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Viasat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BK Technologies's PE ratio is 18.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viasat is 0.42x versus 2.28x for BK Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comtech Telecommunications has a net margin of -21.45% compared to Viasat's net margin of 26.77%. Viasat's return on equity of -11.66% beat Comtech Telecommunications's return on equity of -66.89%.

Viasat has a consensus price target of $18.29, signalling upside risk potential of 23.47%. On the other hand Comtech Telecommunications has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 92.31%. Given that Comtech Telecommunications has higher upside potential than Viasat, analysts believe Comtech Telecommunications is more attractive than Viasat.

Viasat has a beta of 1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 17.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comtech Telecommunications has a beta of 1.244, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.383%.

Viasat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comtech Telecommunications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viasat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comtech Telecommunications pays out -0.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Viasat quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Comtech Telecommunications quarterly revenues of $126.8M. Viasat's net income of -$246.1M is lower than Comtech Telecommunications's net income of $33.9M. Notably, Viasat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Comtech Telecommunications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viasat is 0.42x versus 0.14x for Comtech Telecommunications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CommScope Holding has a net margin of -21.45% compared to Viasat's net margin of 70.49%. Viasat's return on equity of -11.66% beat CommScope Holding's return on equity of --.

Viasat has a consensus price target of $18.29, signalling upside risk potential of 23.47%. On the other hand CommScope Holding has an analysts' consensus of $5.10 which suggests that it could fall by -37.81%. Given that Viasat has higher upside potential than CommScope Holding, analysts believe Viasat is more attractive than CommScope Holding.

Viasat has a beta of 1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 17.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommScope Holding has a beta of 2.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 137.561%.

Viasat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CommScope Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viasat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CommScope Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viasat quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than CommScope Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Viasat's net income of -$246.1M is lower than CommScope Holding's net income of $784M. Notably, Viasat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CommScope Holding's PE ratio is 3.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viasat is 0.42x versus 0.40x for CommScope Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harmonic has a net margin of -21.45% compared to Viasat's net margin of 4.46%. Viasat's return on equity of -11.66% beat Harmonic's return on equity of 12.43%.

Viasat has a consensus price target of $18.29, signalling upside risk potential of 23.47%. On the other hand Harmonic has an analysts' consensus of $11.58 which suggests that it could grow by 17.96%. Given that Viasat has higher upside potential than Harmonic, analysts believe Viasat is more attractive than Harmonic.

Viasat has a beta of 1.171, which suggesting that the stock is 17.117% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harmonic has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.533%.

Viasat has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harmonic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viasat pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harmonic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Viasat quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Harmonic quarterly revenues of $133.1M. Viasat's net income of -$246.1M is lower than Harmonic's net income of $5.9M. Notably, Viasat's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harmonic's PE ratio is 21.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viasat is 0.42x versus 1.66x for Harmonic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.