XCH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG has a net margin of -10.57% compared to XCHG's net margin of --. XCHG's return on equity of -- beat KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG's return on equity of 0.62%.

XCHG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that XCHG has higher upside potential than KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG, analysts believe XCHG is more attractive than KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG.

XCHG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG has a beta of 0.134, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.563%.

XCHG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XCHG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XCHG quarterly revenues are $9M, which are larger than KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG quarterly revenues of --. XCHG's net income of -$951.2K is higher than KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG's net income of --. Notably, XCHG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG's PE ratio is 125.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XCHG is 3.31x versus 0.30x for KHD Humboldt Wedag International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heramba Electric PLC has a net margin of -10.57% compared to XCHG's net margin of --. XCHG's return on equity of -- beat Heramba Electric PLC's return on equity of --.

XCHG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Heramba Electric PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that XCHG has higher upside potential than Heramba Electric PLC, analysts believe XCHG is more attractive than Heramba Electric PLC.

XCHG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heramba Electric PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

XCHG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heramba Electric PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XCHG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heramba Electric PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XCHG quarterly revenues are $9M, which are larger than Heramba Electric PLC quarterly revenues of --. XCHG's net income of -$951.2K is higher than Heramba Electric PLC's net income of --. Notably, XCHG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Heramba Electric PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XCHG is 3.31x versus -- for Heramba Electric PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schmid Group NV has a net margin of -10.57% compared to XCHG's net margin of --. XCHG's return on equity of -- beat Schmid Group NV's return on equity of --.

XCHG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schmid Group NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that XCHG has higher upside potential than Schmid Group NV, analysts believe XCHG is more attractive than Schmid Group NV.

XCHG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schmid Group NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

XCHG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Schmid Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XCHG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Schmid Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XCHG quarterly revenues are $9M, which are larger than Schmid Group NV quarterly revenues of --. XCHG's net income of -$951.2K is higher than Schmid Group NV's net income of --. Notably, XCHG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Schmid Group NV's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XCHG is 3.31x versus -- for Schmid Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siemens AG has a net margin of -10.57% compared to XCHG's net margin of 9.13%. XCHG's return on equity of -- beat Siemens AG's return on equity of 15.56%.

XCHG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Siemens AG has an analysts' consensus of $111.16 which suggests that it could grow by 12.37%. Given that Siemens AG has higher upside potential than XCHG, analysts believe Siemens AG is more attractive than XCHG.

XCHG has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siemens AG has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.777%.

XCHG has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siemens AG offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.53 per share. XCHG pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siemens AG pays out 44.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Siemens AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

XCHG quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than Siemens AG quarterly revenues of $22.9B. XCHG's net income of -$951.2K is lower than Siemens AG's net income of $2.1B. Notably, XCHG's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Siemens AG's PE ratio is 17.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XCHG is 3.31x versus 1.88x for Siemens AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.