EH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of -299.26% compared to EHang Holdings's net margin of -4.52%. EHang Holdings's return on equity of -35.14% beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 0.3%.

EHang Holdings has a consensus price target of $27.31, signalling upside risk potential of 58.5%. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.95%. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than CBAK Energy Technology, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than CBAK Energy Technology.

EHang Holdings has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.733, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.252%.

EHang Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EHang Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EHang Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.6M, which are smaller than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $34.9M. EHang Holdings's net income of -$10.7M is lower than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, EHang Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 6,224.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EHang Holdings is 20.42x versus 0.72x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunrise New Energy has a net margin of -299.26% compared to EHang Holdings's net margin of --. EHang Holdings's return on equity of -35.14% beat Sunrise New Energy's return on equity of -47.67%.

EHang Holdings has a consensus price target of $27.31, signalling upside risk potential of 58.5%. On the other hand Sunrise New Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than Sunrise New Energy, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than Sunrise New Energy.

EHang Holdings has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunrise New Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EHang Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunrise New Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EHang Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sunrise New Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EHang Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.6M, which are larger than Sunrise New Energy quarterly revenues of --. EHang Holdings's net income of -$10.7M is higher than Sunrise New Energy's net income of --. Notably, EHang Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sunrise New Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EHang Holdings is 20.42x versus 0.37x for Sunrise New Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of -299.26% compared to EHang Holdings's net margin of --. EHang Holdings's return on equity of -35.14% beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.

EHang Holdings has a consensus price target of $27.31, signalling upside risk potential of 58.5%. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2263.64%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than EHang Holdings, analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than EHang Holdings.

EHang Holdings has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.244, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.354%.

EHang Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EHang Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EHang Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.6M, which are larger than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. EHang Holdings's net income of -$10.7M is higher than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, EHang Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 2.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EHang Holdings is 20.42x versus 0.05x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a net margin of -299.26% compared to EHang Holdings's net margin of --. EHang Holdings's return on equity of -35.14% beat MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of --.

EHang Holdings has a consensus price target of $27.31, signalling upside risk potential of 58.5%. On the other hand MingZhu Logistics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.

EHang Holdings has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.127% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EHang Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EHang Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EHang Holdings quarterly revenues are $3.6M, which are larger than MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues of --. EHang Holdings's net income of -$10.7M is higher than MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of --. Notably, EHang Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MingZhu Logistics Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EHang Holdings is 20.42x versus 0.14x for MingZhu Logistics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.