Is Roku Stock Undervalued Now?
At roughly $89 a share, Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU) trades for barely…
Sell
4
YGMZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.77
Seasonality move
:
-23.56%
Day range:
$0.75 - $0.78
52-week range:
$0.64 - $1.77
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.10x
P/B ratio:
1.32x
Volume:
34K
Avg. volume:
186K
1-year change:
-52.77%
Market cap:
$59M
Revenue:
$40.4M
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YGMZ
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
$34.7M | -- | -29.79% | -- | $1.50 |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
$39.6M | -$0.03 | 77.1% | -83.04% | $27.30 |
|
EPOW
Sunrise New Energy
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YGMZ
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
|
$0.77 | -- | $59M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.10x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
$0.65 | -- | $3.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.88x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
$1.07 | $1.50 | $96.2M | 5,459.18x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.63x |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
$17.69 | $27.30 | $1.3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 20.97x |
|
EPOW
Sunrise New Energy
|
$0.98 | -- | $26.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.40x |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
$3.90 | -- | $18.7M | 2.83x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YGMZ
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
|
-- | -2.132 | -- | -- |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
13.06% | -1.129 | 96.59% | 7.40x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
21.85% | 1.727 | 50.25% | 0.35x |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
15.56% | -0.298 | 1.56% | 2.28x |
|
EPOW
Sunrise New Energy
|
108.53% | 0.820 | 55.94% | 0.41x |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
1.33% | 0.549 | 15.23% | 2.08x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
YGMZ
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
$82.8K | -$381.1K | -7.41% | -8.7% | -90.4% | $235.3K |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
$4.8M | -$2.9M | 0.24% | 0.3% | -8.36% | -$22.3M |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
$2.2M | -$12.4M | -29.36% | -35.14% | -289.38% | -- |
|
EPOW
Sunrise New Energy
|
-- | -- | -31.76% | -47.67% | -- | -- |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
-- | -- | 8.14% | 8.22% | -- | -- |
MingZhu Logistics Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns YGMZ or ATXG?
Addentax Group has a net margin of -- compared to MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net margin of -102.49%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Addentax Group's return on equity of -8.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings-- -- -- ATXGAddentax Group7.82% -$0.19 $27.4M -
What do Analysts Say About YGMZ or ATXG?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Addentax Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MingZhu Logistics Holdings has higher upside potential than Addentax Group, analysts believe MingZhu Logistics Holdings is more attractive than Addentax Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0 0 0 ATXGAddentax Group0 0 0 -
Is YGMZ or ATXG More Risky?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Addentax Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YGMZ or ATXG?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Addentax Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Addentax Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YGMZ or ATXG?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Addentax Group quarterly revenues of $1.1M. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Addentax Group's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, MingZhu Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Addentax Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MingZhu Logistics Holdings is 0.10x versus 0.88x for Addentax Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0.10x -- -- -- ATXGAddentax Group0.88x -- $1.1M -$1.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns YGMZ or CBAT?
CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of -- compared to MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net margin of -4.52%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of -- beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 0.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings-- -- -- CBATCBAK Energy Technology13.74% -$0.02 $152.5M -
What do Analysts Say About YGMZ or CBAT?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 40.19%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0 0 0 CBATCBAK Energy Technology0 0 0 -
Is YGMZ or CBAT More Risky?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.730, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.953%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YGMZ or CBAT?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YGMZ or CBAT?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $34.9M. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of -- is lower than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, MingZhu Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 5,459.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MingZhu Logistics Holdings is 0.10x versus 0.63x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0.10x -- -- -- CBATCBAK Energy Technology0.63x 5,459.18x $34.9M -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns YGMZ or EH?
EHang Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net margin of -299.26%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of -- beat EHang Holdings's return on equity of -35.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings-- -- -- EHEHang Holdings62.44% -$0.15 $150.4M -
What do Analysts Say About YGMZ or EH?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EHang Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $27.30 which suggests that it could grow by 54.68%. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0 0 0 EHEHang Holdings10 0 0 -
Is YGMZ or EH More Risky?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EHang Holdings has a beta of 1.062, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.249%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YGMZ or EH?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EHang Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EHang Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YGMZ or EH?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EHang Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.6M. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of -- is lower than EHang Holdings's net income of -$10.7M. Notably, MingZhu Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EHang Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MingZhu Logistics Holdings is 0.10x versus 20.97x for EHang Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0.10x -- -- -- EHEHang Holdings20.97x -- $3.6M -$10.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns YGMZ or EPOW?
Sunrise New Energy has a net margin of -- compared to MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net margin of --. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Sunrise New Energy's return on equity of -47.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings-- -- -- EPOWSunrise New Energy-- -- $74M -
What do Analysts Say About YGMZ or EPOW?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sunrise New Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MingZhu Logistics Holdings has higher upside potential than Sunrise New Energy, analysts believe MingZhu Logistics Holdings is more attractive than Sunrise New Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0 0 0 EPOWSunrise New Energy0 0 0 -
Is YGMZ or EPOW More Risky?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunrise New Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YGMZ or EPOW?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunrise New Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sunrise New Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YGMZ or EPOW?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sunrise New Energy quarterly revenues of --. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Sunrise New Energy's net income of --. Notably, MingZhu Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sunrise New Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MingZhu Logistics Holdings is 0.10x versus 0.40x for Sunrise New Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0.10x -- -- -- EPOWSunrise New Energy0.40x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns YGMZ or NISN?
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of -- compared to MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net margin of --. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of -- beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings-- -- -- NISNNiSun International Enterprise Development Group-- -- $211.6M -
What do Analysts Say About YGMZ or NISN?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2233.33%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0 0 0 NISNNiSun International Enterprise Development Group0 0 0 -
Is YGMZ or NISN More Risky?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.200, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.967%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock YGMZ or NISN?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios YGMZ or NISN?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of -- is lower than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, MingZhu Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 2.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MingZhu Logistics Holdings is 0.10x versus 0.05x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0.10x -- -- -- NISNNiSun International Enterprise Development Group0.05x 2.83x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Microsoft Be a $5 Trillion Stock?
Microsoft’s market capitalization sits near $3.73 trillion today. To clear the…
Where Will C3.ai Stock Be in 1 Year?
C3 .ai (NYSE: AI) has been the poster child for “hype versus execution.”…
Stock Ideas
Buy
69
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 56x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
58
INKT alert for Jul 12
MiNK Therapeutics [INKT] is up 727.94% over the past day.
Buy
51
NEGG alert for Jul 12
Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is up 74.03% over the past day.
Buy
68
ATRO alert for Jul 12
Astronics [ATRO] is up 16.28% over the past day.
