WWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boeing has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Woodward's net margin of -0.19%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.01% beat Boeing's return on equity of --.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $222.03, signalling downside risk potential of -5.36%. On the other hand Boeing has an analysts' consensus of $216.53 which suggests that it could fall by -0.45%. Given that Woodward has more downside risk than Boeing, analysts believe Boeing is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boeing has a beta of 1.432, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.202%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Boeing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Boeing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $883.6M, which are smaller than Boeing quarterly revenues of $19.5B. Woodward's net income of $108.9M is higher than Boeing's net income of -$37M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.90x while Boeing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 4.30x versus 2.14x for Boeing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ducommun has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Woodward's net margin of 5.42%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.01% beat Ducommun's return on equity of 5.26%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $222.03, signalling downside risk potential of -5.36%. On the other hand Ducommun has an analysts' consensus of $81.40 which suggests that it could grow by 10.34%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ducommun has a beta of 1.333, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.279%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Ducommun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Ducommun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Woodward's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $883.6M, which are larger than Ducommun quarterly revenues of $194.1M. Woodward's net income of $108.9M is higher than Ducommun's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.90x while Ducommun's PE ratio is 31.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 4.30x versus 1.41x for Ducommun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Howmet Aerospace has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Woodward's net margin of 17.71%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.01% beat Howmet Aerospace's return on equity of 28.27%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $222.03, signalling downside risk potential of -5.36%. On the other hand Howmet Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $167.86 which suggests that it could fall by -4.36%. Given that Woodward has more downside risk than Howmet Aerospace, analysts believe Howmet Aerospace is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Howmet Aerospace has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.907%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Howmet Aerospace offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Howmet Aerospace pays out 9.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $883.6M, which are smaller than Howmet Aerospace quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Woodward's net income of $108.9M is lower than Howmet Aerospace's net income of $344M. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.90x while Howmet Aerospace's PE ratio is 57.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 4.30x versus 9.50x for Howmet Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Woodward's net margin of 7.56%. Woodward's return on equity of 17.01% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Woodward has a consensus price target of $222.03, signalling downside risk potential of -5.36%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $140.28 which suggests that it could grow by 0.85%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than Woodward, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than Woodward.

Woodward has a beta of 1.245, which suggesting that the stock is 24.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.116%.

Woodward has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. RTX offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Woodward pays 15.63% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Woodward quarterly revenues are $883.6M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Woodward's net income of $108.9M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Woodward's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.90x while RTX's PE ratio is 40.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Woodward is 4.30x versus 2.29x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.