ATRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ducommun has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Astronics's net margin of 5.42%. Astronics's return on equity of -1.37% beat Ducommun's return on equity of 5.26%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $32.92, signalling upside risk potential of 1.19%. On the other hand Ducommun has an analysts' consensus of $85.60 which suggests that it could grow by 3.32%. Given that Ducommun has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe Ducommun is more attractive than Astronics.

Astronics has a beta of 1.550, which suggesting that the stock is 55.006% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ducommun has a beta of 1.360, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.012%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ducommun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ducommun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $205.9M, which are larger than Ducommun quarterly revenues of $194.1M. Astronics's net income of $9.5M is lower than Ducommun's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ducommun's PE ratio is 35.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 1.48x versus 1.58x for Ducommun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leonardo DRS has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Astronics's net margin of 6.26%. Astronics's return on equity of -1.37% beat Leonardo DRS's return on equity of 9.46%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $32.92, signalling upside risk potential of 1.19%. On the other hand Leonardo DRS has an analysts' consensus of $47.11 which suggests that it could grow by 3.98%. Given that Leonardo DRS has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe Leonardo DRS is more attractive than Astronics.

Astronics has a beta of 1.550, which suggesting that the stock is 55.006% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leonardo DRS has a beta of 0.630, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.979%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leonardo DRS offers a yield of 0.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leonardo DRS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $205.9M, which are smaller than Leonardo DRS quarterly revenues of $799M. Astronics's net income of $9.5M is lower than Leonardo DRS's net income of $50M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leonardo DRS's PE ratio is 52.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 1.48x versus 3.64x for Leonardo DRS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Heico has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Astronics's net margin of 14.28%. Astronics's return on equity of -1.37% beat Heico's return on equity of 14.92%.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $32.92, signalling upside risk potential of 1.19%. On the other hand Heico has an analysts' consensus of $208.25 which suggests that it could fall by -16.43%. Given that Astronics has higher upside potential than Heico, analysts believe Astronics is more attractive than Heico.

Astronics has a beta of 1.550, which suggesting that the stock is 55.006% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Heico has a beta of 1.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.943%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Heico offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heico pays out 5.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Heico's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $205.9M, which are smaller than Heico quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Astronics's net income of $9.5M is lower than Heico's net income of $156.8M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Heico's PE ratio is 58.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 1.48x versus 8.47x for Heico. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransDigm Group has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Astronics's net margin of 22.28%. Astronics's return on equity of -1.37% beat TransDigm Group's return on equity of --.

Astronics has a consensus price target of $32.92, signalling upside risk potential of 1.19%. On the other hand TransDigm Group has an analysts' consensus of $1,575.69 which suggests that it could grow by 4.24%. Given that TransDigm Group has higher upside potential than Astronics, analysts believe TransDigm Group is more attractive than Astronics.

Astronics has a beta of 1.550, which suggesting that the stock is 55.006% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.043, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.318%.

Astronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TransDigm Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $75.00 per share. Astronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TransDigm Group pays out 118.9% of its earnings as a dividend.

Astronics quarterly revenues are $205.9M, which are smaller than TransDigm Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Astronics's net income of $9.5M is lower than TransDigm Group's net income of $479M. Notably, Astronics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TransDigm Group's PE ratio is 51.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astronics is 1.48x versus 10.46x for TransDigm Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.