UGRO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Art's-Way Manufacturing has a net margin of -13.78% compared to Urban-gro's net margin of -0.5%. Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43% beat Art's-Way Manufacturing's return on equity of -7.61%.

Urban-gro has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Art's-Way Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 366.98%. Given that Art's-Way Manufacturing has higher upside potential than Urban-gro, analysts believe Art's-Way Manufacturing is more attractive than Urban-gro.

Urban-gro has a beta of 1.667, which suggesting that the stock is 66.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Art's-Way Manufacturing has a beta of 0.404, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.637%.

Urban-gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Art's-Way Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urban-gro pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Art's-Way Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Urban-gro quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than Art's-Way Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $6.7M. Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Art's-Way Manufacturing's net income of -$33.3K. Notably, Urban-gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Art's-Way Manufacturing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban-gro is 0.18x versus 0.30x for Art's-Way Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CEA Industries has a net margin of -13.78% compared to Urban-gro's net margin of -189.45%. Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

Urban-gro has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Urban-gro has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Urban-gro is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Urban-gro has a beta of 1.667, which suggesting that the stock is 66.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.25%.

Urban-gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urban-gro pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Urban-gro quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M is lower than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, Urban-gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban-gro is 0.18x versus 2.18x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a net margin of -13.78% compared to Urban-gro's net margin of -29.87%. Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -23.5%.

Urban-gro has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hydrofarm Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.25%. Given that Hydrofarm Holdings Group has higher upside potential than Urban-gro, analysts believe Hydrofarm Holdings Group is more attractive than Urban-gro.

Urban-gro has a beta of 1.667, which suggesting that the stock is 66.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Urban-gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urban-gro pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Urban-gro quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues of $44M. Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$13.1M. Notably, Urban-gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hydrofarm Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban-gro is 0.18x versus 0.14x for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nikola has a net margin of -13.78% compared to Urban-gro's net margin of -793.38%. Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43% beat Nikola's return on equity of -112.88%.

Urban-gro has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nikola has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 978.26%. Given that Nikola has higher upside potential than Urban-gro, analysts believe Nikola is more attractive than Urban-gro.

Urban-gro has a beta of 1.667, which suggesting that the stock is 66.652% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nikola has a beta of 1.920, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.977%.

Urban-gro has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nikola offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urban-gro pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nikola pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Urban-gro quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Nikola quarterly revenues of $25.2M. Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Nikola's net income of -$199.8M. Notably, Urban-gro's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nikola's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban-gro is 0.18x versus 0.68x for Nikola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.