What Is the Ceiling for IONQ Stock?
IonQ (NYSE:IONQ) is a quantum computing startup that, like many…
Buy
69
UCTT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$24.95
Seasonality move
:
-0.39%
Day range:
$24.81 - $25.40
52-week range:
$16.66 - $56.47
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
40.35x
P/S ratio:
0.53x
P/B ratio:
1.30x
Volume:
368.1K
Avg. volume:
563.6K
1-year change:
-54.59%
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
$2.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.62
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UCTT
Ultra Clean Holdings
|
$500.8M | $0.27 | -2.96% | -35.71% | $30.75 |
|
AMKR
Amkor Technology
|
$1.4B | $0.16 | -2.73% | -41.29% | $22.00 |
|
ENTG
Entegris
|
$755.4M | $0.62 | -7.24% | 39.22% | $98.61 |
|
INTT
inTest
|
$28M | -$0.03 | -17.65% | -40% | $10.50 |
|
NVDA
NVIDIA
|
$43.2B | $0.75 | 51.75% | 48.94% | $175.31 |
|
RMBS
Rambus
|
$167M | $0.59 | 26.36% | 78.28% | $72.92 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UCTT
Ultra Clean Holdings
|
$25.02 | $30.75 | $1.1B | 40.35x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.53x |
|
AMKR
Amkor Technology
|
$21.89 | $22.00 | $5.4B | 17.09x | $0.08 | 1.49% | 0.86x |
|
ENTG
Entegris
|
$88.00 | $98.61 | $13.3B | 43.14x | $0.10 | 0.46% | 4.12x |
|
INTT
inTest
|
$7.51 | $10.50 | $93.8M | 25.91x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.72x |
|
NVDA
NVIDIA
|
$164.10 | $175.31 | $4T | 52.94x | $0.01 | 0.02% | 27.33x |
|
RMBS
Rambus
|
$64.60 | $72.92 | $6.9B | 33.65x | $0.00 | 0% | 11.59x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UCTT
Ultra Clean Holdings
|
35.55% | 2.834 | 46.64% | 1.71x |
|
AMKR
Amkor Technology
|
21.66% | 1.893 | 26.02% | 1.80x |
|
ENTG
Entegris
|
51.52% | 1.083 | 30.1% | 1.72x |
|
INTT
inTest
|
10.64% | 1.240 | 13.54% | 1.38x |
|
NVDA
NVIDIA
|
9.17% | 1.862 | 0.32% | 2.82x |
|
RMBS
Rambus
|
-- | 2.221 | -- | 9.27x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
UCTT
Ultra Clean Holdings
|
$84M | $12.9M | 2% | 3.06% | 2.85% | $15.8M |
|
AMKR
Amkor Technology
|
$157.6M | $31.5M | 6% | 7.64% | 3.22% | -$55.7M |
|
ENTG
Entegris
|
$356.5M | $122.3M | 4.05% | 8.64% | 15.83% | $32.4M |
|
INTT
inTest
|
$11.1M | -$2.6M | -0.09% | -0.1% | -9.9% | $5.3M |
|
NVDA
NVIDIA
|
$26.7B | $21.6B | 101.04% | 114.12% | 49.87% | $26.2B |
|
RMBS
Rambus
|
$133.8M | $63.2M | 19.4% | 19.4% | 40.8% | $69.5M |
Ultra Clean Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns UCTT or AMKR?
Amkor Technology has a net margin of -0.96% compared to Ultra Clean Holdings's net margin of 1.6%. Ultra Clean Holdings's return on equity of 3.06% beat Amkor Technology's return on equity of 7.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UCTTUltra Clean Holdings16.2% -$0.11 $1.4B AMKRAmkor Technology11.92% $0.09 $5.3B -
What do Analysts Say About UCTT or AMKR?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 22.9%. On the other hand Amkor Technology has an analysts' consensus of $22.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.5%. Given that Ultra Clean Holdings has higher upside potential than Amkor Technology, analysts believe Ultra Clean Holdings is more attractive than Amkor Technology.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UCTTUltra Clean Holdings3 0 0 AMKRAmkor Technology2 5 0 -
Is UCTT or AMKR More Risky?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a beta of 2.071, which suggesting that the stock is 107.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amkor Technology has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.856%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UCTT or AMKR?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amkor Technology offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Ultra Clean Holdings pays 2.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Amkor Technology pays out 50.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UCTT or AMKR?
Ultra Clean Holdings quarterly revenues are $518.6M, which are smaller than Amkor Technology quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Ultra Clean Holdings's net income of -$5M is lower than Amkor Technology's net income of $21.1M. Notably, Ultra Clean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.35x while Amkor Technology's PE ratio is 17.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultra Clean Holdings is 0.53x versus 0.86x for Amkor Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0.53x 40.35x $518.6M -$5M AMKRAmkor Technology0.86x 17.09x $1.3B $21.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns UCTT or ENTG?
Entegris has a net margin of -0.96% compared to Ultra Clean Holdings's net margin of 8.14%. Ultra Clean Holdings's return on equity of 3.06% beat Entegris's return on equity of 8.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UCTTUltra Clean Holdings16.2% -$0.11 $1.4B ENTGEntegris46.11% $0.41 $7.7B -
What do Analysts Say About UCTT or ENTG?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 22.9%. On the other hand Entegris has an analysts' consensus of $98.61 which suggests that it could grow by 12.06%. Given that Ultra Clean Holdings has higher upside potential than Entegris, analysts believe Ultra Clean Holdings is more attractive than Entegris.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UCTTUltra Clean Holdings3 0 0 ENTGEntegris5 2 0 -
Is UCTT or ENTG More Risky?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a beta of 2.071, which suggesting that the stock is 107.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entegris has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.526%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UCTT or ENTG?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Entegris offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Ultra Clean Holdings pays 2.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris pays out 20.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UCTT or ENTG?
Ultra Clean Holdings quarterly revenues are $518.6M, which are smaller than Entegris quarterly revenues of $773.2M. Ultra Clean Holdings's net income of -$5M is lower than Entegris's net income of $62.9M. Notably, Ultra Clean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.35x while Entegris's PE ratio is 43.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultra Clean Holdings is 0.53x versus 4.12x for Entegris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0.53x 40.35x $518.6M -$5M ENTGEntegris4.12x 43.14x $773.2M $62.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns UCTT or INTT?
inTest has a net margin of -0.96% compared to Ultra Clean Holdings's net margin of -8.74%. Ultra Clean Holdings's return on equity of 3.06% beat inTest's return on equity of -0.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UCTTUltra Clean Holdings16.2% -$0.11 $1.4B INTTinTest41.51% -$0.19 $111.2M -
What do Analysts Say About UCTT or INTT?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 22.9%. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 39.81%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than Ultra Clean Holdings, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than Ultra Clean Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UCTTUltra Clean Holdings3 0 0 INTTinTest2 1 0 -
Is UCTT or INTT More Risky?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a beta of 2.071, which suggesting that the stock is 107.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.655, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.54%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UCTT or INTT?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultra Clean Holdings pays 2.11% of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultra Clean Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UCTT or INTT?
Ultra Clean Holdings quarterly revenues are $518.6M, which are larger than inTest quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Ultra Clean Holdings's net income of -$5M is lower than inTest's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Ultra Clean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.35x while inTest's PE ratio is 25.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultra Clean Holdings is 0.53x versus 0.72x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0.53x 40.35x $518.6M -$5M INTTinTest0.72x 25.91x $26.6M -$2.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns UCTT or NVDA?
NVIDIA has a net margin of -0.96% compared to Ultra Clean Holdings's net margin of 42.61%. Ultra Clean Holdings's return on equity of 3.06% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UCTTUltra Clean Holdings16.2% -$0.11 $1.4B NVDANVIDIA60.52% $0.76 $92.3B -
What do Analysts Say About UCTT or NVDA?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 22.9%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $175.31 which suggests that it could grow by 6.83%. Given that Ultra Clean Holdings has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Ultra Clean Holdings is more attractive than NVIDIA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UCTTUltra Clean Holdings3 0 0 NVDANVIDIA48 6 1 -
Is UCTT or NVDA More Risky?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a beta of 2.071, which suggesting that the stock is 107.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UCTT or NVDA?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Ultra Clean Holdings pays 2.11% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UCTT or NVDA?
Ultra Clean Holdings quarterly revenues are $518.6M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Ultra Clean Holdings's net income of -$5M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Ultra Clean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.35x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 52.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultra Clean Holdings is 0.53x versus 27.33x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0.53x 40.35x $518.6M -$5M NVDANVIDIA27.33x 52.94x $44.1B $18.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns UCTT or RMBS?
Rambus has a net margin of -0.96% compared to Ultra Clean Holdings's net margin of 36.18%. Ultra Clean Holdings's return on equity of 3.06% beat Rambus's return on equity of 19.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital UCTTUltra Clean Holdings16.2% -$0.11 $1.4B RMBSRambus80.3% $0.56 $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About UCTT or RMBS?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a consensus price target of $30.75, signalling upside risk potential of 22.9%. On the other hand Rambus has an analysts' consensus of $72.92 which suggests that it could grow by 12.88%. Given that Ultra Clean Holdings has higher upside potential than Rambus, analysts believe Ultra Clean Holdings is more attractive than Rambus.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings UCTTUltra Clean Holdings3 0 0 RMBSRambus7 1 0 -
Is UCTT or RMBS More Risky?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a beta of 2.071, which suggesting that the stock is 107.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rambus has a beta of 1.240, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.994%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock UCTT or RMBS?
Ultra Clean Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rambus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ultra Clean Holdings pays 2.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Rambus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultra Clean Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios UCTT or RMBS?
Ultra Clean Holdings quarterly revenues are $518.6M, which are larger than Rambus quarterly revenues of $166.7M. Ultra Clean Holdings's net income of -$5M is lower than Rambus's net income of $60.3M. Notably, Ultra Clean Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.35x while Rambus's PE ratio is 33.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ultra Clean Holdings is 0.53x versus 11.59x for Rambus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income UCTTUltra Clean Holdings0.53x 40.35x $518.6M -$5M RMBSRambus11.59x 33.65x $166.7M $60.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Can FUBO Stock Double?
TV streaming service Fubo (NYSE:FUBO) has seen incredible returns so…
Where Will CoreWeave Stock Be in 1 Year?
When CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV) slipped below its $40 IPO price…
Stock Ideas
Buy
69
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 56x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
76
MP alert for Jul 11
MP Materials [MP] is down 0.31% over the past day.
Buy
51
NEGG alert for Jul 11
Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is up 74.03% over the past day.
Buy
76
UAL alert for Jul 11
United Airlines Holdings [UAL] is down 4.35% over the past day.
