RMBS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Entegris has a net margin of 36.18% compared to Rambus's net margin of 8.14%. Rambus's return on equity of 19.4% beat Entegris's return on equity of 8.64%.

Rambus has a consensus price target of $72.92, signalling upside risk potential of 13.84%. On the other hand Entegris has an analysts' consensus of $98.20 which suggests that it could grow by 13.88%. Given that Entegris has higher upside potential than Rambus, analysts believe Entegris is more attractive than Rambus.

Rambus has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entegris has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.526%.

Rambus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Entegris offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Rambus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris pays out 20.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Entegris's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rambus quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than Entegris quarterly revenues of $773.2M. Rambus's net income of $60.3M is lower than Entegris's net income of $62.9M. Notably, Rambus's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.36x while Entegris's PE ratio is 42.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rambus is 11.49x versus 4.04x for Entegris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 36.18% compared to Rambus's net margin of 35.53%. Rambus's return on equity of 19.4% beat KLA's return on equity of 104.91%.

Rambus has a consensus price target of $72.92, signalling upside risk potential of 13.84%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $830.45 which suggests that it could fall by -10.18%. Given that Rambus has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Rambus is more attractive than KLA.

Rambus has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.272%.

Rambus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLA offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Rambus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rambus quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Rambus's net income of $60.3M is lower than KLA's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Rambus's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.36x while KLA's PE ratio is 33.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rambus is 11.49x versus 10.76x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 36.18% compared to Rambus's net margin of 42.61%. Rambus's return on equity of 19.4% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Rambus has a consensus price target of $72.92, signalling upside risk potential of 13.84%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $175.31 which suggests that it could grow by 6.3%. Given that Rambus has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Rambus is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Rambus has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

Rambus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Rambus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rambus quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Rambus's net income of $60.3M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Rambus's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.36x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 53.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rambus is 11.49x versus 27.47x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ultra Clean Holdings has a net margin of 36.18% compared to Rambus's net margin of -0.96%. Rambus's return on equity of 19.4% beat Ultra Clean Holdings's return on equity of 3.06%.

Rambus has a consensus price target of $72.92, signalling upside risk potential of 13.84%. On the other hand Ultra Clean Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $30.75 which suggests that it could grow by 23.25%. Given that Ultra Clean Holdings has higher upside potential than Rambus, analysts believe Ultra Clean Holdings is more attractive than Rambus.

Rambus has a beta of 1.240, which suggesting that the stock is 23.994% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ultra Clean Holdings has a beta of 2.071, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.115%.

Rambus has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ultra Clean Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rambus pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ultra Clean Holdings pays out 2.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ultra Clean Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rambus quarterly revenues are $166.7M, which are smaller than Ultra Clean Holdings quarterly revenues of $518.6M. Rambus's net income of $60.3M is higher than Ultra Clean Holdings's net income of -$5M. Notably, Rambus's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.36x while Ultra Clean Holdings's PE ratio is 40.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rambus is 11.49x versus 0.53x for Ultra Clean Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.