THRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Standard Motor Products has a net margin of -0.04% compared to Gentherm's net margin of 3.04%. Gentherm's return on equity of 7.79% beat Standard Motor Products's return on equity of 4.81%.

Gentherm has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.83%. On the other hand Standard Motor Products has an analysts' consensus of $40.50 which suggests that it could grow by 33.84%. Given that Gentherm has higher upside potential than Standard Motor Products, analysts believe Gentherm is more attractive than Standard Motor Products.

Gentherm has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.191% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standard Motor Products has a beta of 0.655, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.519%.

Gentherm has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Standard Motor Products offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Gentherm pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products pays out 92.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gentherm quarterly revenues are $353.9M, which are smaller than Standard Motor Products quarterly revenues of $413.4M. Gentherm's net income of -$128K is lower than Standard Motor Products's net income of $12.6M. Notably, Gentherm's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.23x while Standard Motor Products's PE ratio is 21.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentherm is 0.59x versus 0.44x for Standard Motor Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stoneridge has a net margin of -0.04% compared to Gentherm's net margin of -3.3%. Gentherm's return on equity of 7.79% beat Stoneridge's return on equity of -6.68%.

Gentherm has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.83%. On the other hand Stoneridge has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 129.13%. Given that Stoneridge has higher upside potential than Gentherm, analysts believe Stoneridge is more attractive than Gentherm.

Gentherm has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.191% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stoneridge has a beta of 1.317, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.723%.

Gentherm has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stoneridge offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gentherm pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stoneridge pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gentherm quarterly revenues are $353.9M, which are larger than Stoneridge quarterly revenues of $217.9M. Gentherm's net income of -$128K is higher than Stoneridge's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Gentherm's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.23x while Stoneridge's PE ratio is 204.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentherm is 0.59x versus 0.19x for Stoneridge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -0.04% compared to Gentherm's net margin of 2.12%. Gentherm's return on equity of 7.79% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Gentherm has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.83%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $301.97 which suggests that it could fall by -6.46%. Given that Gentherm has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Gentherm is more attractive than Tesla.

Gentherm has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.191% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.818%.

Gentherm has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gentherm pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gentherm quarterly revenues are $353.9M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Gentherm's net income of -$128K is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Gentherm's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.23x while Tesla's PE ratio is 177.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentherm is 0.59x versus 11.80x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a net margin of -0.04% compared to Gentherm's net margin of -44.58%. Gentherm's return on equity of 7.79% beat Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -47.22%.

Gentherm has a consensus price target of $38.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.83%. On the other hand Twin Vee PowerCats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3603.7%. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Gentherm, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Gentherm.

Gentherm has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.191% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gentherm has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Vee PowerCats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gentherm pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Vee PowerCats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gentherm quarterly revenues are $353.9M, which are larger than Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues of $3.6M. Gentherm's net income of -$128K is higher than Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Gentherm's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.23x while Twin Vee PowerCats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentherm is 0.59x versus 0.19x for Twin Vee PowerCats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.