THRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Standard Motor Products has a net margin of 4.3% compared to Gentherm's net margin of 0.95%. Gentherm's return on equity of 10.41% beat Standard Motor Products's return on equity of 5.54%.

Gentherm has a consensus price target of $69.20, signalling upside risk potential of 58.03%. On the other hand Standard Motor Products has an analysts' consensus of $40.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.23%. Given that Gentherm has higher upside potential than Standard Motor Products, analysts believe Gentherm is more attractive than Standard Motor Products.

Gentherm has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standard Motor Products has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.494%.

Gentherm has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Standard Motor Products offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Gentherm pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products pays out 73.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gentherm quarterly revenues are $371.5M, which are smaller than Standard Motor Products quarterly revenues of $399.3M. Gentherm's net income of $16M is higher than Standard Motor Products's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Gentherm's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while Standard Motor Products's PE ratio is 18.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentherm is 0.83x versus 0.47x for Standard Motor Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stoneridge has a net margin of 4.3% compared to Gentherm's net margin of -3.31%. Gentherm's return on equity of 10.41% beat Stoneridge's return on equity of -2.68%.

Gentherm has a consensus price target of $69.20, signalling upside risk potential of 58.03%. On the other hand Stoneridge has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 160.71%. Given that Stoneridge has higher upside potential than Gentherm, analysts believe Stoneridge is more attractive than Gentherm.

Gentherm has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stoneridge has a beta of 1.353, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.265%.

Gentherm has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stoneridge offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gentherm pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stoneridge pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gentherm quarterly revenues are $371.5M, which are larger than Stoneridge quarterly revenues of $213.8M. Gentherm's net income of $16M is higher than Stoneridge's net income of -$7.1M. Notably, Gentherm's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while Stoneridge's PE ratio is 204.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentherm is 0.83x versus 0.16x for Stoneridge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 4.3% compared to Gentherm's net margin of 8.61%. Gentherm's return on equity of 10.41% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Gentherm has a consensus price target of $69.20, signalling upside risk potential of 58.03%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $296.71 which suggests that it could fall by -24.83%. Given that Gentherm has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Gentherm is more attractive than Tesla.

Gentherm has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.123%.

Gentherm has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gentherm pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gentherm quarterly revenues are $371.5M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Gentherm's net income of $16M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Gentherm's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while Tesla's PE ratio is 108.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentherm is 0.83x versus 14.18x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a net margin of 4.3% compared to Gentherm's net margin of -86.59%. Gentherm's return on equity of 10.41% beat Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -34.03%.

Gentherm has a consensus price target of $69.20, signalling upside risk potential of 58.03%. On the other hand Twin Vee PowerCats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1659.02%. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Gentherm, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Gentherm.

Gentherm has a beta of 1.421, which suggesting that the stock is 42.103% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gentherm has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Vee PowerCats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gentherm pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Vee PowerCats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gentherm quarterly revenues are $371.5M, which are larger than Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues of $2.9M. Gentherm's net income of $16M is higher than Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Gentherm's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while Twin Vee PowerCats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gentherm is 0.83x versus 0.21x for Twin Vee PowerCats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.