TER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electro-Sensors has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 8.38%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9% beat Electro-Sensors's return on equity of 3.19%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $99.83, signalling upside risk potential of 29.92%. On the other hand Electro-Sensors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Teradyne has higher upside potential than Electro-Sensors, analysts believe Teradyne is more attractive than Electro-Sensors.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.701, which suggesting that the stock is 70.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electro-Sensors has a beta of 0.272, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.809%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Electro-Sensors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Electro-Sensors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $685.7M, which are larger than Electro-Sensors quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Teradyne's net income of $98.9M is higher than Electro-Sensors's net income of $201K. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Electro-Sensors's PE ratio is 29.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 4.32x versus 1.44x for Electro-Sensors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 81.39%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9% beat Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 58.45%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $99.83, signalling upside risk potential of 29.92%. On the other hand Frequency Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Teradyne has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Teradyne is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.701, which suggesting that the stock is 70.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.377, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.313%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Frequency Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Frequency Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $685.7M, which are larger than Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues of $18.9M. Teradyne's net income of $98.9M is higher than Frequency Electronics's net income of $15.4M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Frequency Electronics's PE ratio is 7.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 4.32x versus 2.48x for Frequency Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 10.78%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9% beat Itron's return on equity of 18.23%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $99.83, signalling upside risk potential of 29.92%. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $129.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.59%. Given that Teradyne has higher upside potential than Itron, analysts believe Teradyne is more attractive than Itron.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.701, which suggesting that the stock is 70.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.307, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.716%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Teradyne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $685.7M, which are larger than Itron quarterly revenues of $607.2M. Teradyne's net income of $98.9M is higher than Itron's net income of $65.5M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Itron's PE ratio is 19.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 4.32x versus 2.04x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS Instruments has a net margin of 14.42% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 9.74%. Teradyne's return on equity of 20.9% beat MKS Instruments's return on equity of 8.06%.

Teradyne has a consensus price target of $99.83, signalling upside risk potential of 29.92%. On the other hand MKS Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $114.11 which suggests that it could grow by 47.64%. Given that MKS Instruments has higher upside potential than Teradyne, analysts believe MKS Instruments is more attractive than Teradyne.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.701, which suggesting that the stock is 70.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS Instruments has a beta of 1.806, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.602%.

Teradyne has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. MKS Instruments offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Teradyne pays 14.09% of its earnings as a dividend. MKS Instruments pays out 31.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Teradyne quarterly revenues are $685.7M, which are smaller than MKS Instruments quarterly revenues of $934M. Teradyne's net income of $98.9M is higher than MKS Instruments's net income of $91M. Notably, Teradyne's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while MKS Instruments's PE ratio is 27.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Teradyne is 4.32x versus 1.46x for MKS Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.