FEIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cohu has a net margin of 81.39% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of -31.82%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 58.45% beat Cohu's return on equity of -9.81%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cohu has an analysts' consensus of $24.75 which suggests that it could grow by 45.93%. Given that Cohu has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Cohu is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.377, which suggesting that the stock is 62.313% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohu has a beta of 1.219, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.916%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cohu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cohu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than Cohu quarterly revenues of $96.8M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $15.4M is higher than Cohu's net income of -$30.8M. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.91x while Cohu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 2.79x versus 2.03x for Cohu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Electro-Sensors has a net margin of 81.39% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of -2.86%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 58.45% beat Electro-Sensors's return on equity of 2.64%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Electro-Sensors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Frequency Electronics has higher upside potential than Electro-Sensors, analysts believe Frequency Electronics is more attractive than Electro-Sensors.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.377, which suggesting that the stock is 62.313% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electro-Sensors has a beta of 0.272, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.809%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electro-Sensors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electro-Sensors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are larger than Electro-Sensors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $15.4M is higher than Electro-Sensors's net income of -$64K. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.91x while Electro-Sensors's PE ratio is 37.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 2.79x versus 1.50x for Electro-Sensors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of 81.39% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of 10.78%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 58.45% beat Itron's return on equity of 18.23%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $128.58 which suggests that it could grow by 14.16%. Given that Itron has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Itron is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.377, which suggesting that the stock is 62.313% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.307, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.716%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than Itron quarterly revenues of $607.2M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $15.4M is lower than Itron's net income of $65.5M. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.91x while Itron's PE ratio is 20.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 2.79x versus 2.13x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS has a net margin of 81.39% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of 5.56%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 58.45% beat MKS's return on equity of 9.72%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MKS has an analysts' consensus of $115.96 which suggests that it could grow by 38.34%. Given that MKS has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe MKS is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.377, which suggesting that the stock is 62.313% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS has a beta of 1.806, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.602%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MKS offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MKS pays out 31.05% of its earnings as a dividend. MKS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than MKS quarterly revenues of $936M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $15.4M is lower than MKS's net income of $52M. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.91x while MKS's PE ratio is 25.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 2.79x versus 1.55x for MKS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.