AEHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Electro-Sensors has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Aehr Test Systems's net margin of -2.86%. Aehr Test Systems's return on equity of 20.12% beat Electro-Sensors's return on equity of 2.64%.

Aehr Test Systems has a consensus price target of $11.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.46%. On the other hand Electro-Sensors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aehr Test Systems has higher upside potential than Electro-Sensors, analysts believe Aehr Test Systems is more attractive than Electro-Sensors.

Aehr Test Systems has a beta of 2.211, which suggesting that the stock is 121.101% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electro-Sensors has a beta of 0.272, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.809%.

Aehr Test Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electro-Sensors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aehr Test Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electro-Sensors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aehr Test Systems quarterly revenues are $18.3M, which are larger than Electro-Sensors quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Aehr Test Systems's net income of -$643K is lower than Electro-Sensors's net income of -$64K. Notably, Aehr Test Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.77x while Electro-Sensors's PE ratio is 38.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aehr Test Systems is 4.80x versus 1.54x for Electro-Sensors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Frequency Electronics has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Aehr Test Systems's net margin of 81.39%. Aehr Test Systems's return on equity of 20.12% beat Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 58.45%.

Aehr Test Systems has a consensus price target of $11.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.46%. On the other hand Frequency Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aehr Test Systems has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Aehr Test Systems is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Aehr Test Systems has a beta of 2.211, which suggesting that the stock is 121.101% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.377, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.313%.

Aehr Test Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Frequency Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Aehr Test Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Frequency Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aehr Test Systems quarterly revenues are $18.3M, which are smaller than Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues of $18.9M. Aehr Test Systems's net income of -$643K is lower than Frequency Electronics's net income of $15.4M. Notably, Aehr Test Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.77x while Frequency Electronics's PE ratio is 8.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aehr Test Systems is 4.80x versus 2.96x for Frequency Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Aehr Test Systems's net margin of 10.78%. Aehr Test Systems's return on equity of 20.12% beat Itron's return on equity of 18.23%.

Aehr Test Systems has a consensus price target of $11.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.46%. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $129.38 which suggests that it could grow by 13.79%. Given that Aehr Test Systems has higher upside potential than Itron, analysts believe Aehr Test Systems is more attractive than Itron.

Aehr Test Systems has a beta of 2.211, which suggesting that the stock is 121.101% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.307, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.716%.

Aehr Test Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aehr Test Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aehr Test Systems quarterly revenues are $18.3M, which are smaller than Itron quarterly revenues of $607.2M. Aehr Test Systems's net income of -$643K is lower than Itron's net income of $65.5M. Notably, Aehr Test Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.77x while Itron's PE ratio is 20.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aehr Test Systems is 4.80x versus 2.15x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Aehr Test Systems's net margin of 5.56%. Aehr Test Systems's return on equity of 20.12% beat MKS's return on equity of 9.72%.

Aehr Test Systems has a consensus price target of $11.50, signalling upside risk potential of 15.46%. On the other hand MKS has an analysts' consensus of $115.96 which suggests that it could grow by 35.78%. Given that MKS has higher upside potential than Aehr Test Systems, analysts believe MKS is more attractive than Aehr Test Systems.

Aehr Test Systems has a beta of 2.211, which suggesting that the stock is 121.101% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS has a beta of 1.806, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.602%.

Aehr Test Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MKS offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Aehr Test Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MKS pays out 31.05% of its earnings as a dividend. MKS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aehr Test Systems quarterly revenues are $18.3M, which are smaller than MKS quarterly revenues of $936M. Aehr Test Systems's net income of -$643K is lower than MKS's net income of $52M. Notably, Aehr Test Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.77x while MKS's PE ratio is 25.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aehr Test Systems is 4.80x versus 1.58x for MKS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.