RVSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Elbit Systems has a net margin of -- compared to Rail Vision's net margin of 5.65%. Rail Vision's return on equity of -- beat Elbit Systems's return on equity of 11.29%.

Rail Vision has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 418%. On the other hand Elbit Systems has an analysts' consensus of $357.33 which suggests that it could fall by -5.7%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than Elbit Systems, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than Elbit Systems.

Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.312, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.79%.

Rail Vision has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elbit Systems offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Rail Vision pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems pays out 27.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rail Vision quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Elbit Systems quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Rail Vision's net income of -- is lower than Elbit Systems's net income of $107.1M. Notably, Rail Vision's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Elbit Systems's PE ratio is 48.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rail Vision is 4.94x versus 2.37x for Elbit Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kornit Digital has a net margin of -- compared to Rail Vision's net margin of -10.89%. Rail Vision's return on equity of -- beat Kornit Digital's return on equity of -1.14%.

Rail Vision has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 418%. On the other hand Kornit Digital has an analysts' consensus of $30.17 which suggests that it could grow by 37.5%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than Kornit Digital, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than Kornit Digital.

Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital has a beta of 1.998, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.818%.

Rail Vision has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kornit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rail Vision pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rail Vision quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kornit Digital quarterly revenues of $46.5M. Rail Vision's net income of -- is lower than Kornit Digital's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Rail Vision's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kornit Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rail Vision is 4.94x versus 5.00x for Kornit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SuperCom has a net margin of -- compared to Rail Vision's net margin of 59.95%. Rail Vision's return on equity of -- beat SuperCom's return on equity of 44.56%.

Rail Vision has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 418%. On the other hand SuperCom has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 61.11%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than SuperCom, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than SuperCom.

Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SuperCom has a beta of 0.813, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.726%.

Rail Vision has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SuperCom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rail Vision pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SuperCom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rail Vision quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SuperCom quarterly revenues of $7M. Rail Vision's net income of -- is lower than SuperCom's net income of $4.2M. Notably, Rail Vision's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SuperCom's PE ratio is 11.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rail Vision is 4.94x versus 0.57x for SuperCom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TAT Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Rail Vision's net margin of 9.05%. Rail Vision's return on equity of -- beat TAT Technologies's return on equity of 12.24%.

Rail Vision has a consensus price target of $2.00, signalling upside risk potential of 418%. On the other hand TAT Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.59%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than TAT Technologies, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than TAT Technologies.

Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.693%.

Rail Vision has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TAT Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rail Vision pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rail Vision quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TAT Technologies quarterly revenues of $42.1M. Rail Vision's net income of -- is lower than TAT Technologies's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Rail Vision's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TAT Technologies's PE ratio is 26.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rail Vision is 4.94x versus 2.10x for TAT Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.