STRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adtalem Global Education has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 13.05%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.76% beat Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 16.71%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $102.67, signalling upside risk potential of 21.47%. On the other hand Adtalem Global Education has an analysts' consensus of $141.25 which suggests that it could grow by 17.67%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Adtalem Global Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Adtalem Global Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.543, which suggesting that the stock is 45.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.924, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.61%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.84%. Adtalem Global Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Education pays 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Adtalem Global Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $303.6M, which are smaller than Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues of $466.1M. Strategic Education's net income of $29.7M is lower than Adtalem Global Education's net income of $60.8M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.06x while Adtalem Global Education's PE ratio is 20.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.65x versus 2.66x for Adtalem Global Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laureate Education has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of -8.26%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.76% beat Laureate Education's return on equity of 31.19%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $102.67, signalling upside risk potential of 21.47%. On the other hand Laureate Education has an analysts' consensus of $24.13 which suggests that it could grow by 10.77%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Laureate Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Laureate Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.543, which suggesting that the stock is 45.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laureate Education has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.958%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.84%. Laureate Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Strategic Education pays 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Laureate Education pays out 0.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $303.6M, which are larger than Laureate Education quarterly revenues of $236.2M. Strategic Education's net income of $29.7M is higher than Laureate Education's net income of -$19.5M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.06x while Laureate Education's PE ratio is 11.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.65x versus 2.16x for Laureate Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 24.76%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.76% beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.87%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $102.67, signalling upside risk potential of 21.47%. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of $217.33 which suggests that it could grow by 18.43%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.543, which suggesting that the stock is 45.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.795, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.489%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.84%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Education pays 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $303.6M, which are larger than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $289.3M. Strategic Education's net income of $29.7M is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $71.6M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.06x while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 23.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.65x versus 5.08x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perdoceo Education has a net margin of 9.8% compared to Strategic Education's net margin of 20.51%. Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.76% beat Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39%.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $102.67, signalling upside risk potential of 21.47%. On the other hand Perdoceo Education has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.26%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Strategic Education, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Strategic Education.

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.543, which suggesting that the stock is 45.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perdoceo Education has a beta of 0.850, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.017%.

Strategic Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.84%. Perdoceo Education offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Strategic Education pays 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education pays out 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategic Education quarterly revenues are $303.6M, which are larger than Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues of $213M. Strategic Education's net income of $29.7M is lower than Perdoceo Education's net income of $43.7M. Notably, Strategic Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.06x while Perdoceo Education's PE ratio is 14.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Education is 1.65x versus 2.98x for Perdoceo Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.