SKYT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 1.61% compared to SkyWater Technology's net margin of -44.61%. SkyWater Technology's return on equity of -26.24% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -10.25%.

SkyWater Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -19.55%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $120.80 which suggests that it could grow by 4.19%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than SkyWater Technology, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than SkyWater Technology.

SkyWater Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.457, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.674%.

SkyWater Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. SkyWater Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -22.16% of its earnings as a dividend.

SkyWater Technology quarterly revenues are $93.8M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.5B. SkyWater Technology's net income of $1.5M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of -$676.3M. Notably, SkyWater Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SkyWater Technology is 2.02x versus 18.66x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 1.61% compared to SkyWater Technology's net margin of 21.47%. SkyWater Technology's return on equity of -26.24% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 8.71%.

SkyWater Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -19.55%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $132.01 which suggests that it could grow by 47.86%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than SkyWater Technology, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than SkyWater Technology.

SkyWater Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.005%.

SkyWater Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. SkyWater Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SkyWater Technology quarterly revenues are $93.8M, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.7B. SkyWater Technology's net income of $1.5M is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, SkyWater Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 25.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SkyWater Technology is 2.02x versus 3.47x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 1.61% compared to SkyWater Technology's net margin of 55.04%. SkyWater Technology's return on equity of -26.24% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

SkyWater Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -19.55%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 23.24%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than SkyWater Technology, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than SkyWater Technology.

SkyWater Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

SkyWater Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. SkyWater Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SkyWater Technology quarterly revenues are $93.8M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. SkyWater Technology's net income of $1.5M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, SkyWater Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SkyWater Technology is 2.02x versus 30.78x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ON Semiconductor has a net margin of 1.61% compared to SkyWater Technology's net margin of 22.8%. SkyWater Technology's return on equity of -26.24% beat ON Semiconductor's return on equity of 21.72%.

SkyWater Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -19.55%. On the other hand ON Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $85.87 which suggests that it could grow by 26.47%. Given that ON Semiconductor has higher upside potential than SkyWater Technology, analysts believe ON Semiconductor is more attractive than SkyWater Technology.

SkyWater Technology has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ON Semiconductor has a beta of 1.628, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.845%.

SkyWater Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ON Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SkyWater Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ON Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SkyWater Technology quarterly revenues are $93.8M, which are smaller than ON Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $1.8B. SkyWater Technology's net income of $1.5M is lower than ON Semiconductor's net income of $401.7M. Notably, SkyWater Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ON Semiconductor's PE ratio is 16.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SkyWater Technology is 2.02x versus 4.01x for ON Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.