CEVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Micron Technology has a net margin of -4.82% compared to CEVA's net margin of 21.47%. CEVA's return on equity of -1.25% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 8.71%.

CEVA has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.81%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $132.01 which suggests that it could grow by 47.86%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than CEVA, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than CEVA.

CEVA has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.858% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.005%.

CEVA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. CEVA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CEVA quarterly revenues are $27.2M, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.7B. CEVA's net income of -$1.3M is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, CEVA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 25.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CEVA is 7.47x versus 3.47x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -4.82% compared to CEVA's net margin of 55.04%. CEVA's return on equity of -1.25% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

CEVA has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.81%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 23.24%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than CEVA, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than CEVA.

CEVA has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.858% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.635, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

CEVA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. CEVA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CEVA quarterly revenues are $27.2M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. CEVA's net income of -$1.3M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, CEVA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CEVA is 7.47x versus 30.78x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ON Semiconductor has a net margin of -4.82% compared to CEVA's net margin of 22.8%. CEVA's return on equity of -1.25% beat ON Semiconductor's return on equity of 21.72%.

CEVA has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.81%. On the other hand ON Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $85.87 which suggests that it could grow by 26.47%. Given that ON Semiconductor has higher upside potential than CEVA, analysts believe ON Semiconductor is more attractive than CEVA.

CEVA has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.858% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ON Semiconductor has a beta of 1.628, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.845%.

CEVA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ON Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CEVA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ON Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CEVA quarterly revenues are $27.2M, which are smaller than ON Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $1.8B. CEVA's net income of -$1.3M is lower than ON Semiconductor's net income of $401.7M. Notably, CEVA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ON Semiconductor's PE ratio is 16.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CEVA is 7.47x versus 4.01x for ON Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SkyWater Technology has a net margin of -4.82% compared to CEVA's net margin of 1.61%. CEVA's return on equity of -1.25% beat SkyWater Technology's return on equity of -26.24%.

CEVA has a consensus price target of $33.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.81%. On the other hand SkyWater Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -19.55%. Given that CEVA has higher upside potential than SkyWater Technology, analysts believe CEVA is more attractive than SkyWater Technology.

CEVA has a beta of 1.269, which suggesting that the stock is 26.858% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SkyWater Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CEVA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SkyWater Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CEVA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SkyWater Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CEVA quarterly revenues are $27.2M, which are smaller than SkyWater Technology quarterly revenues of $93.8M. CEVA's net income of -$1.3M is lower than SkyWater Technology's net income of $1.5M. Notably, CEVA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SkyWater Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CEVA is 7.47x versus 2.02x for SkyWater Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.