SKWD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 12.73% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of 11.36%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.08% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.13%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $62.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.66%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.347, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.319%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $330.5M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $42.1M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $138.4M. Notably, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.28x while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 29.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is 1.87x versus 4.62x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fundamental Global has a net margin of 12.73% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of -2488.52%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.08% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of -9.3%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $62.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.66%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.898, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.178%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out -122.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $330.5M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $392K. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $42.1M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.28x while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is 1.87x versus 1.70x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 12.73% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of 5.27%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.08% beat Root's return on equity of 29.8%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $62.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.66%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $133.80 which suggests that it could grow by 8.16%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Root.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $330.5M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $349.4M. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $42.1M is higher than Root's net income of $18.4M. Notably, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.28x while Root's PE ratio is 38.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is 1.87x versus 1.61x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 12.73% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of -0.43%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.08% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $62.33, signalling upside risk potential of 13.66%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 0.56%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Trupanion, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Trupanion.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.817, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.724%.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues are $330.5M, which are smaller than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $342M. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $42.1M is higher than Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.28x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is 1.87x versus 1.67x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.