TRUP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Employers Holdings has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 6.32%. Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34% beat Employers Holdings's return on equity of 9.76%.

Trupanion has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.31%. On the other hand Employers Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $55.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.96%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Employers Holdings, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Employers Holdings.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.723, which suggesting that the stock is 72.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.794%.

Trupanion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Employers Holdings offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Trupanion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Employers Holdings pays out 25.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Employers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trupanion quarterly revenues are $342M, which are larger than Employers Holdings quarterly revenues of $202.6M. Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Employers Holdings's net income of $12.8M. Notably, Trupanion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Employers Holdings's PE ratio is 11.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion is 1.43x versus 1.41x for Employers Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 11.36%. Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.13%.

Trupanion has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.31%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.723, which suggesting that the stock is 72.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.376, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.421%.

Trupanion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Trupanion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trupanion quarterly revenues are $342M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $138.4M. Notably, Trupanion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 29.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion is 1.43x versus 4.70x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fundamental Global has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Trupanion's net margin of -2488.52%. Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of -9.3%.

Trupanion has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.31%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.723, which suggesting that the stock is 72.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.885%.

Trupanion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trupanion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out -122.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Trupanion quarterly revenues are $342M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $392K. Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Trupanion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion is 1.43x versus 1.76x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 5.27%. Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34% beat Root's return on equity of 29.8%.

Trupanion has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.31%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $133.80 which suggests that it could grow by 3.24%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Root.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.723, which suggesting that the stock is 72.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Trupanion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trupanion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trupanion quarterly revenues are $342M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $349.4M. Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Root's net income of $18.4M. Notably, Trupanion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Root's PE ratio is 40.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion is 1.43x versus 1.69x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.