TRUP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Employers Holdings has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 6.32%. Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34% beat Employers Holdings's return on equity of 9.76%.

Trupanion has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 2.41%. On the other hand Employers Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $55.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.86%. Given that Employers Holdings has higher upside potential than Trupanion, analysts believe Employers Holdings is more attractive than Trupanion.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.812, which suggesting that the stock is 81.237% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Employers Holdings has a beta of 0.560, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.998%.

Trupanion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Employers Holdings offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Trupanion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Employers Holdings pays out 25.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Employers Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trupanion quarterly revenues are $342M, which are larger than Employers Holdings quarterly revenues of $202.6M. Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Employers Holdings's net income of $12.8M. Notably, Trupanion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Employers Holdings's PE ratio is 11.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion is 1.64x versus 1.37x for Employers Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 11.36%. Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.13%.

Trupanion has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 2.41%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.812, which suggesting that the stock is 81.237% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.367, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.331%.

Trupanion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Trupanion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trupanion quarterly revenues are $342M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $138.4M. Notably, Trupanion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 30.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion is 1.64x versus 4.88x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fundamental Global has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Trupanion's net margin of -2488.52%. Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of -9.3%.

Trupanion has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 2.41%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.812, which suggesting that the stock is 81.237% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.910, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.007%.

Trupanion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trupanion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out -122.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Trupanion quarterly revenues are $342M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $392K. Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Trupanion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion is 1.64x versus 1.75x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lemonade has a net margin of -0.43% compared to Trupanion's net margin of -41.27%. Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34% beat Lemonade's return on equity of -35.7%.

Trupanion has a consensus price target of $52.25, signalling upside risk potential of 2.41%. On the other hand Lemonade has an analysts' consensus of $30.43 which suggests that it could fall by -25.71%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Lemonade, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Lemonade.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.812, which suggesting that the stock is 81.237% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lemonade has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Trupanion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lemonade offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trupanion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lemonade pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trupanion quarterly revenues are $342M, which are larger than Lemonade quarterly revenues of $151.2M. Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M is higher than Lemonade's net income of -$62.4M. Notably, Trupanion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lemonade's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion is 1.64x versus 5.26x for Lemonade. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.