ACT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fundamental Global has a net margin of 54.02% compared to Enact Holdings's net margin of -2488.52%. Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.03% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of -9.3%.

Enact Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.17%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enact Holdings has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Enact Holdings is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.885%.

Enact Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings pays 16.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out -122.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings quarterly revenues are $306.9M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $392K. Enact Holdings's net income of $165.8M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Enact Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.97x while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings is 4.52x versus 1.70x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 54.02% compared to Enact Holdings's net margin of 5.27%. Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.03% beat Root's return on equity of 29.8%.

Enact Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.17%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $133.80 which suggests that it could grow by 2.15%. Given that Enact Holdings has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Enact Holdings is more attractive than Root.

Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enact Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings pays 16.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings quarterly revenues are $306.9M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $349.4M. Enact Holdings's net income of $165.8M is higher than Root's net income of $18.4M. Notably, Enact Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.97x while Root's PE ratio is 40.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings is 4.52x versus 1.71x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of 54.02% compared to Enact Holdings's net margin of 12.73%. Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.03% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.08%.

Enact Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.17%. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $62.33 which suggests that it could fall by -1.61%. Given that Enact Holdings has higher upside potential than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, analysts believe Enact Holdings is more attractive than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group.

Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enact Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings pays 16.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings quarterly revenues are $306.9M, which are smaller than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $330.5M. Enact Holdings's net income of $165.8M is higher than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $42.1M. Notably, Enact Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.97x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 21.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings is 4.52x versus 2.16x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 54.02% compared to Enact Holdings's net margin of -0.43%. Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.03% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34%.

Enact Holdings has a consensus price target of $39.00, signalling upside risk potential of 10.17%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 10.72%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Enact Holdings, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Enact Holdings.

Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.33%.

Enact Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.16%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings pays 16.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings quarterly revenues are $306.9M, which are smaller than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $342M. Enact Holdings's net income of $165.8M is higher than Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Enact Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.97x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings is 4.52x versus 1.52x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.