EAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 3.55%. Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07% beat Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 41.51%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $164.27, signalling downside risk potential of -4.84%. On the other hand Cheesecake Factory has an analysts' consensus of $55.06 which suggests that it could fall by -0.2%. Given that Brinker International has more downside risk than Cheesecake Factory, analysts believe Cheesecake Factory is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 1.656, which suggesting that the stock is 65.618% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1.106, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.617%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheesecake Factory offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory pays out 33.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Cheesecake Factory quarterly revenues of $927.2M. Brinker International's net income of $119.1M is higher than Cheesecake Factory's net income of $32.9M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.81x while Cheesecake Factory's PE ratio is 17.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.56x versus 0.75x for Cheesecake Factory. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 10.24%. Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07% beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.6%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $164.27, signalling downside risk potential of -4.84%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $208.22 which suggests that it could fall by -2.8%. Given that Brinker International has more downside risk than Darden Restaurants, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 1.656, which suggesting that the stock is 65.618% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.742, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.833%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Brinker International's net income of $119.1M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $323.4M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.81x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 24.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.56x versus 2.17x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Brinker International's net margin of -5.83%. Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07% beat Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -5.55%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $164.27, signalling downside risk potential of -4.84%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA has an analysts' consensus of $64.44 which suggests that it could fall by -2.45%. Given that Brinker International has more downside risk than Kura Sushi USA, analysts believe Kura Sushi USA is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 1.656, which suggesting that the stock is 65.618% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.551, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.076%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kura Sushi USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues of $64.9M. Brinker International's net income of $119.1M is higher than Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.81x while Kura Sushi USA's PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.56x versus 2.94x for Kura Sushi USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 7.85%. Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07% beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 32.92%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $164.27, signalling downside risk potential of -4.84%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $185.92 which suggests that it could fall by -4.76%. Given that Brinker International has more downside risk than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 1.656, which suggesting that the stock is 65.618% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.267%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Brinker International's net income of $119.1M is higher than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $113.7M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.81x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 30.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.56x versus 2.38x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.