RFIL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hubbell has a net margin of -1.3% compared to RF Industries's net margin of 12.43%. RF Industries's return on equity of -4.19% beat Hubbell's return on equity of 25.32%.

RF Industries has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling downside risk potential of -3.7%. On the other hand Hubbell has an analysts' consensus of $420.85 which suggests that it could grow by 1.38%. Given that Hubbell has higher upside potential than RF Industries, analysts believe Hubbell is more attractive than RF Industries.

RF Industries has a beta of 0.778, which suggesting that the stock is 22.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hubbell has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.129%.

RF Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hubbell offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. RF Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RF Industries quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than Hubbell quarterly revenues of $1.4B. RF Industries's net income of -$245K is lower than Hubbell's net income of $169.7M. Notably, RF Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hubbell's PE ratio is 28.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RF Industries is 0.93x versus 4.01x for Hubbell. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimball Electronics has a net margin of -1.3% compared to RF Industries's net margin of 1.02%. RF Industries's return on equity of -4.19% beat Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 3.31%.

RF Industries has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling downside risk potential of -3.7%. On the other hand Kimball Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $19.75 which suggests that it could fall by -1.55%. Given that RF Industries has more downside risk than Kimball Electronics, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than RF Industries.

RF Industries has a beta of 0.778, which suggesting that the stock is 22.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.2%.

RF Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kimball Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RF Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kimball Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RF Industries quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues of $374.6M. RF Industries's net income of -$245K is lower than Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.8M. Notably, RF Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kimball Electronics's PE ratio is 28.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RF Industries is 0.93x versus 0.33x for Kimball Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of -1.3% compared to RF Industries's net margin of 7.67%. RF Industries's return on equity of -4.19% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42%.

RF Industries has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling downside risk potential of -3.7%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $138.50 which suggests that it could fall by -4.99%. Given that Limbach Holdings has more downside risk than RF Industries, analysts believe RF Industries is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

RF Industries has a beta of 0.778, which suggesting that the stock is 22.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.681%.

RF Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RF Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RF Industries quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.1M. RF Industries's net income of -$245K is lower than Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M. Notably, RF Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 52.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RF Industries is 0.93x versus 3.29x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International has a net margin of -1.3% compared to RF Industries's net margin of --. RF Industries's return on equity of -4.19% beat Orbit International's return on equity of --.

RF Industries has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling downside risk potential of -3.7%. On the other hand Orbit International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 45.63%. Given that Orbit International has higher upside potential than RF Industries, analysts believe Orbit International is more attractive than RF Industries.

RF Industries has a beta of 0.778, which suggesting that the stock is 22.181% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International has a beta of 0.162, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.825%.

RF Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Orbit International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. RF Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RF Industries quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are larger than Orbit International quarterly revenues of --. RF Industries's net income of -$245K is higher than Orbit International's net income of --. Notably, RF Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Orbit International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RF Industries is 0.93x versus 0.61x for Orbit International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.