LMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 20.37%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $128.25, signalling downside risk potential of -5.21%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $34.33 which suggests that it could grow by 17.42%. Given that CECO Environmental has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe CECO Environmental is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.637% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.346, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.645%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are smaller than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $176.7M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is lower than CECO Environmental's net income of $36M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.49x while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 22.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 3.06x versus 1.76x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of -11.58%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $128.25, signalling downside risk potential of -5.21%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.93%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.637% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 348.319%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $6.4M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.49x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 3.06x versus 3.19x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Griffon has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 9.28%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat Griffon's return on equity of 105.75%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $128.25, signalling downside risk potential of -5.21%. On the other hand Griffon has an analysts' consensus of $96.71 which suggests that it could grow by 35.7%. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.637% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Griffon has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.327%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Griffon offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon pays out 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are smaller than Griffon quarterly revenues of $611.7M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is lower than Griffon's net income of $56.8M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.49x while Griffon's PE ratio is 14.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 3.06x versus 1.34x for Griffon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 11.22%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $128.25, signalling downside risk potential of -5.21%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $559.17 which suggests that it could fall by -1.03%. Given that Limbach Holdings has more downside risk than Lennox International, analysts believe Lennox International is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.206, which suggesting that the stock is 20.637% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.129%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are smaller than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is lower than Lennox International's net income of $120.3M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 48.49x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 25.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 3.06x versus 3.77x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.