Why Is Planet Labs Stock Up Today?
Planet Labs (NYSE: PL) opened Friday trading with an unmistakable…
Sell
24
PTEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$5.91
Seasonality move
:
1.89%
Day range:
$5.71 - $5.94
52-week range:
$5.12 - $11.27
Dividend yield:
5.44%
P/E ratio:
36.81x
P/S ratio:
0.45x
P/B ratio:
0.66x
Volume:
16M
Avg. volume:
13.2M
1-year change:
-41.67%
Market cap:
$2.3B
Revenue:
$5.4B
EPS (TTM):
-$2.60
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
|
$1.2B | -$0.04 | -8.31% | -98.46% | $8.39 |
|
HES
Hess
|
$3B | $1.61 | -15.89% | -52.62% | $159.26 |
|
HP
Helmerich & Payne
|
$955.4M | $0.62 | 43.77% | -74.05% | $21.67 |
|
LBRT
Liberty Energy
|
$948.5M | $0.03 | -12.7% | -75.27% | $15.75 |
|
NE
Noble Corp PLC
|
$867.9M | $0.38 | 22.72% | -66.35% | $32.91 |
|
SOC
Sable Offshore
|
-- | -$0.43 | -- | -77.36% | $41.60 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
|
$5.89 | $8.39 | $2.3B | 36.81x | $0.08 | 5.44% | 0.45x |
|
HES
Hess
|
$140.12 | $159.26 | $43.3B | 19.38x | $0.50 | 1.43% | 3.46x |
|
HP
Helmerich & Payne
|
$15.53 | $21.67 | $1.5B | 7.12x | $0.25 | 6.44% | 0.50x |
|
LBRT
Liberty Energy
|
$11.58 | $15.75 | $1.9B | 7.67x | $0.08 | 2.68% | 0.46x |
|
NE
Noble Corp PLC
|
$26.91 | $32.91 | $4.3B | 8.97x | $0.50 | 7.43% | 1.27x |
|
SOC
Sable Offshore
|
$22.29 | $41.60 | $2.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
|
26.31% | 0.240 | 38.45% | 1.32x |
|
HES
Hess
|
42.97% | 0.315 | 17.27% | 0.87x |
|
HP
Helmerich & Payne
|
43.29% | -0.138 | 83.48% | 1.11x |
|
LBRT
Liberty Energy
|
9.62% | 0.552 | 8.25% | 0.79x |
|
NE
Noble Corp PLC
|
29.82% | 1.566 | 52.59% | 1.22x |
|
SOC
Sable Offshore
|
-- | 3.495 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy
|
$87.3M | $17.4M | -19.59% | -25.66% | 1.59% | $46.3M |
|
HES
Hess
|
$2.2B | $847M | 11.01% | 19.29% | 29.98% | $389M |
|
HP
Helmerich & Payne
|
$156.7M | $63M | 5.14% | 7.57% | 7.16% | -$102.7M |
|
LBRT
Liberty Energy
|
$88.1M | $22.3M | 12.02% | 13.05% | 3.83% | $58.2M |
|
NE
Noble Corp PLC
|
$237.5M | $202.3M | 7.94% | 10.53% | 21.63% | $157.5M |
|
SOC
Sable Offshore
|
-$3M | -$59.8M | -- | -- | -- | -$111.2M |
Patterson-UTI Energy vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PTEN or HES?
Hess has a net margin of 0.08% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 14.77%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66% beat Hess's return on equity of 19.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6.81% -- $4.7B HESHess76.99% $1.39 $21.1B -
What do Analysts Say About PTEN or HES?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $8.39, signalling upside risk potential of 42.61%. On the other hand Hess has an analysts' consensus of $159.26 which suggests that it could grow by 13.86%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Hess, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Hess.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6 5 0 HESHess5 8 1 -
Is PTEN or HES More Risky?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hess has a beta of 0.621, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.887%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTEN or HES?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.44%. Hess offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess pays out 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTEN or HES?
Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Hess quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M is lower than Hess's net income of $430M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Hess's PE ratio is 19.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.45x versus 3.46x for Hess. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTENPatterson-UTI Energy0.45x 36.81x $1.3B $1M HESHess3.46x 19.38x $2.9B $430M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTEN or HP?
Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of 0.08% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 0.16%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 7.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6.81% -- $4.7B HPHelmerich & Payne15.43% $0.01 $5.3B -
What do Analysts Say About PTEN or HP?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $8.39, signalling upside risk potential of 42.61%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne has an analysts' consensus of $21.67 which suggests that it could grow by 39.52%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6 5 0 HPHelmerich & Payne2 11 2 -
Is PTEN or HP More Risky?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.358%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTEN or HP?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.44%. Helmerich & Payne offers a yield of 6.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTEN or HP?
Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues of $1B. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M is lower than Helmerich & Payne's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Helmerich & Payne's PE ratio is 7.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.45x versus 0.50x for Helmerich & Payne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTENPatterson-UTI Energy0.45x 36.81x $1.3B $1M HPHelmerich & Payne0.50x 7.12x $1B $1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTEN or LBRT?
Liberty Energy has a net margin of 0.08% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 2.06%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66% beat Liberty Energy's return on equity of 13.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6.81% -- $4.7B LBRTLiberty Energy9.01% $0.12 $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About PTEN or LBRT?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $8.39, signalling upside risk potential of 42.61%. On the other hand Liberty Energy has an analysts' consensus of $15.75 which suggests that it could grow by 36.01%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Liberty Energy, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Liberty Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6 5 0 LBRTLiberty Energy4 8 0 -
Is PTEN or LBRT More Risky?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Energy has a beta of 0.675, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.457%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTEN or LBRT?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.44%. Liberty Energy offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Energy pays out 15.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTEN or LBRT?
Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Liberty Energy quarterly revenues of $977.5M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M is lower than Liberty Energy's net income of $20.1M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Liberty Energy's PE ratio is 7.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.45x versus 0.46x for Liberty Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTENPatterson-UTI Energy0.45x 36.81x $1.3B $1M LBRTLiberty Energy0.46x 7.67x $977.5M $20.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTEN or NE?
Noble Corp PLC has a net margin of 0.08% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 12.39%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66% beat Noble Corp PLC's return on equity of 10.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6.81% -- $4.7B NENoble Corp PLC27.16% $0.67 $6.6B -
What do Analysts Say About PTEN or NE?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $8.39, signalling upside risk potential of 42.61%. On the other hand Noble Corp PLC has an analysts' consensus of $32.91 which suggests that it could grow by 22.29%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Noble Corp PLC, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Noble Corp PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6 5 0 NENoble Corp PLC5 3 0 -
Is PTEN or NE More Risky?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noble Corp PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTEN or NE?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.44%. Noble Corp PLC offers a yield of 7.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC pays out 61.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTEN or NE?
Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Noble Corp PLC quarterly revenues of $874.5M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M is lower than Noble Corp PLC's net income of $108.3M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Noble Corp PLC's PE ratio is 8.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.45x versus 1.27x for Noble Corp PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTENPatterson-UTI Energy0.45x 36.81x $1.3B $1M NENoble Corp PLC1.27x 8.97x $874.5M $108.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTEN or SOC?
Sable Offshore has a net margin of 0.08% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of --. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66% beat Sable Offshore's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6.81% -- $4.7B SOCSable Offshore-- -$1.30 -- -
What do Analysts Say About PTEN or SOC?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $8.39, signalling upside risk potential of 42.61%. On the other hand Sable Offshore has an analysts' consensus of $41.60 which suggests that it could grow by 86.63%. Given that Sable Offshore has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Sable Offshore is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTENPatterson-UTI Energy6 5 0 SOCSable Offshore4 0 0 -
Is PTEN or SOC More Risky?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.308, which suggesting that the stock is 30.818% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sable Offshore has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTEN or SOC?
Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.44%. Sable Offshore offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Sable Offshore pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTEN or SOC?
Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Sable Offshore quarterly revenues of --. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M is higher than Sable Offshore's net income of -$109.5M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Sable Offshore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.45x versus -- for Sable Offshore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTENPatterson-UTI Energy0.45x 36.81x $1.3B $1M SOCSable Offshore-- -- -- -$109.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Coherent Stock Breaking Out?
Coherent (NYSE: COHR) has spent the better part of two years…
What Is The Long-term Outlook for AMC Stock?
Meme stock extraordinaire AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:AMC) has long…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 53x
Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Sell
43
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
95
AVAV alert for Jun 27
AeroVironment [AVAV] is up 2.13% over the past day.
Buy
70
AEVA alert for Jun 27
Aeva Technologies [AEVA] is up 8.52% over the past day.
Buy
88
TSSI alert for Jun 27
TSS [TSSI] is down 2.73% over the past day.
