HP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hess has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of 14.77%. Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 7.57% beat Hess's return on equity of 19.29%.

Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 23.93%. On the other hand Hess has an analysts' consensus of $159.26 which suggests that it could grow by 11.95%. Given that Helmerich & Payne has higher upside potential than Hess, analysts believe Helmerich & Payne is more attractive than Hess.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.836, which suggesting that the stock is 16.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hess has a beta of 0.621, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.887%.

Helmerich & Payne has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.47%. Hess offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Helmerich & Payne pays 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Hess pays out 20.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Hess quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Helmerich & Payne's net income of $1.7M is lower than Hess's net income of $430M. Notably, Helmerich & Payne's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while Hess's PE ratio is 19.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helmerich & Payne is 0.59x versus 3.51x for Hess. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noble Corp PLC has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of 12.39%. Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 7.57% beat Noble Corp PLC's return on equity of 10.53%.

Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 23.93%. On the other hand Noble Corp PLC has an analysts' consensus of $32.82 which suggests that it could grow by 12.74%. Given that Helmerich & Payne has higher upside potential than Noble Corp PLC, analysts believe Helmerich & Payne is more attractive than Noble Corp PLC.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.836, which suggesting that the stock is 16.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noble Corp PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Helmerich & Payne has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.47%. Noble Corp PLC offers a yield of 6.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Helmerich & Payne pays 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC pays out 61.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Noble Corp PLC quarterly revenues of $874.5M. Helmerich & Payne's net income of $1.7M is lower than Noble Corp PLC's net income of $108.3M. Notably, Helmerich & Payne's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while Noble Corp PLC's PE ratio is 9.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helmerich & Payne is 0.59x versus 1.38x for Noble Corp PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of 0.08%. Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 7.57% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -25.66%.

Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 23.93%. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $8.45 which suggests that it could grow by 29.35%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.836, which suggesting that the stock is 16.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.308, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.818%.

Helmerich & Payne has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.47%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 4.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Helmerich & Payne pays 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Helmerich & Payne's net income of $1.7M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of $1M. Notably, Helmerich & Payne's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helmerich & Payne is 0.59x versus 0.50x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seadrill has a net margin of 0.16% compared to Helmerich & Payne's net margin of -4.18%. Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 7.57% beat Seadrill's return on equity of 12.63%.

Helmerich & Payne has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 23.93%. On the other hand Seadrill has an analysts' consensus of $41.86 which suggests that it could grow by 43.54%. Given that Seadrill has higher upside potential than Helmerich & Payne, analysts believe Seadrill is more attractive than Helmerich & Payne.

Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 0.836, which suggesting that the stock is 16.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seadrill has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Helmerich & Payne has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.47%. Seadrill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Helmerich & Payne pays 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Seadrill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Seadrill quarterly revenues of $335M. Helmerich & Payne's net income of $1.7M is higher than Seadrill's net income of -$14M. Notably, Helmerich & Payne's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while Seadrill's PE ratio is 5.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Helmerich & Payne is 0.59x versus 1.47x for Seadrill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.