PLBC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comerica has a net margin of 37.28% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 22.69%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3% beat Comerica's return on equity of 9.06%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Comerica has an analysts' consensus of $71.49 which suggests that it could grow by 14.28%. Given that Comerica has higher upside potential than Plumas Bancorp, analysts believe Comerica is more attractive than Plumas Bancorp.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comerica has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.583%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Comerica offers a yield of 4.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Comerica pays out 44.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21M, which are smaller than Comerica quarterly revenues of $811M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M is lower than Comerica's net income of $184M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.13x while Comerica's PE ratio is 15.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 4.71x versus 2.61x for Comerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Central Pacific Financial has a net margin of 37.28% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 20.37%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3% beat Central Pacific Financial's return on equity of 11.2%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Central Pacific Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.08%. Given that Central Pacific Financial has higher upside potential than Plumas Bancorp, analysts believe Central Pacific Financial is more attractive than Plumas Bancorp.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Central Pacific Financial has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.679%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Central Pacific Financial offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Pacific Financial pays out 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21M, which are smaller than Central Pacific Financial quarterly revenues of $65.3M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M is lower than Central Pacific Financial's net income of $13.3M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.13x while Central Pacific Financial's PE ratio is 13.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 4.71x versus 3.17x for Central Pacific Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 37.28% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 16.32%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.21%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Plumas Bancorp, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Plumas Bancorp.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.13x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 4.71x versus 2.92x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 37.28% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 27.77%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 18.3% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.7%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.56%. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than Park National.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.064% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Park National offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 19.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.8M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.13x while Park National's PE ratio is 21.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 4.71x versus 5.82x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.