MIGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BitMine Immersion Technologies has a net margin of -2.25% compared to Mawson Infrastructure Group's net margin of -76.24%. Mawson Infrastructure Group's return on equity of -1202.4% beat BitMine Immersion Technologies's return on equity of -88.47%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 517.09%. On the other hand BitMine Immersion Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mawson Infrastructure Group has higher upside potential than BitMine Immersion Technologies, analysts believe Mawson Infrastructure Group is more attractive than BitMine Immersion Technologies.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a beta of 3.818, which suggesting that the stock is 281.83% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BitMine Immersion Technologies has a beta of 0.568, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.17%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BitMine Immersion Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mawson Infrastructure Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BitMine Immersion Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mawson Infrastructure Group quarterly revenues are $13.8M, which are larger than BitMine Immersion Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Mawson Infrastructure Group's net income of -$310.9K is higher than BitMine Immersion Technologies's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Mawson Infrastructure Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BitMine Immersion Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mawson Infrastructure Group is 0.16x versus 4.04x for BitMine Immersion Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of -2.25% compared to Mawson Infrastructure Group's net margin of 7.22%. Mawson Infrastructure Group's return on equity of -1202.4% beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 517.09%. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $236.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.37%. Given that Mawson Infrastructure Group has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Mawson Infrastructure Group is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a beta of 3.818, which suggesting that the stock is 281.83% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.556%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Mawson Infrastructure Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mawson Infrastructure Group quarterly revenues are $13.8M, which are smaller than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $208.6M. Mawson Infrastructure Group's net income of -$310.9K is lower than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M. Notably, Mawson Infrastructure Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 39.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mawson Infrastructure Group is 0.16x versus 10.35x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -2.25% compared to Mawson Infrastructure Group's net margin of -183.64%. Mawson Infrastructure Group's return on equity of -1202.4% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 517.09%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.60 which suggests that it could grow by 49.28%. Given that Mawson Infrastructure Group has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe Mawson Infrastructure Group is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a beta of 3.818, which suggesting that the stock is 281.83% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 352.9%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mawson Infrastructure Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mawson Infrastructure Group quarterly revenues are $13.8M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. Mawson Infrastructure Group's net income of -$310.9K is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, Mawson Infrastructure Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mawson Infrastructure Group is 0.16x versus 6.98x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siebert Financial has a net margin of -2.25% compared to Mawson Infrastructure Group's net margin of 29.96%. Mawson Infrastructure Group's return on equity of -1202.4% beat Siebert Financial's return on equity of 21.91%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 517.09%. On the other hand Siebert Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mawson Infrastructure Group has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe Mawson Infrastructure Group is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a beta of 3.818, which suggesting that the stock is 281.83% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.243%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siebert Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mawson Infrastructure Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siebert Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mawson Infrastructure Group quarterly revenues are $13.8M, which are smaller than Siebert Financial quarterly revenues of $28.9M. Mawson Infrastructure Group's net income of -$310.9K is lower than Siebert Financial's net income of $8.7M. Notably, Mawson Infrastructure Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Siebert Financial's PE ratio is 11.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mawson Infrastructure Group is 0.16x versus 2.32x for Siebert Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.