HUT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleanspark has a net margin of 44.79% compared to Hut 8's net margin of -76.38%. Hut 8's return on equity of -6.47% beat Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.15%.

Hut 8 has a consensus price target of $25.30, signalling upside risk potential of 49.7%. On the other hand Cleanspark has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 92.7%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than Hut 8, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than Hut 8.

Hut 8 has a beta of 4.153, which suggesting that the stock is 315.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleanspark has a beta of 4.359, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 335.937%.

Hut 8 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleanspark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hut 8 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleanspark pays out -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hut 8 quarterly revenues are -$90.6M, which are smaller than Cleanspark quarterly revenues of $181.7M. Hut 8's net income of -$133.9M is higher than Cleanspark's net income of -$138.8M. Notably, Hut 8's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.03x while Cleanspark's PE ratio is 78.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hut 8 is 6.63x versus 4.83x for Cleanspark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 44.79% compared to Hut 8's net margin of 3.23%. Hut 8's return on equity of -6.47% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

Hut 8 has a consensus price target of $25.30, signalling upside risk potential of 49.7%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $263.69 which suggests that it could fall by -1.02%. Given that Hut 8 has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe Hut 8 is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

Hut 8 has a beta of 4.153, which suggesting that the stock is 315.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hut 8 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hut 8 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hut 8 quarterly revenues are -$90.6M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. Hut 8's net income of -$133.9M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, Hut 8's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.03x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 49.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hut 8 is 6.63x versus 10.36x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of 44.79% compared to Hut 8's net margin of -249.29%. Hut 8's return on equity of -6.47% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of -10.39%.

Hut 8 has a consensus price target of $25.30, signalling upside risk potential of 49.7%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.04 which suggests that it could grow by 21.89%. Given that Hut 8 has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Hut 8 is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

Hut 8 has a beta of 4.153, which suggesting that the stock is 315.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.822, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 582.181%.

Hut 8 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hut 8 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hut 8 quarterly revenues are -$90.6M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.9M. Hut 8's net income of -$133.9M is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of -$533.2M. Notably, Hut 8's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.03x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hut 8 is 6.63x versus 7.68x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 44.79% compared to Hut 8's net margin of -183.64%. Hut 8's return on equity of -6.47% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

Hut 8 has a consensus price target of $25.30, signalling upside risk potential of 49.7%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.40 which suggests that it could grow by 68.49%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Hut 8, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Hut 8.

Hut 8 has a beta of 4.153, which suggesting that the stock is 315.265% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.747, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 374.659%.

Hut 8 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hut 8 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hut 8 quarterly revenues are -$90.6M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. Hut 8's net income of -$133.9M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, Hut 8's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.03x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hut 8 is 6.63x versus 6.10x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.