CLSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of -76.38% compared to Cleanspark's net margin of 3.23%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.15% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.56%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $266.58 which suggests that it could grow by 4.83%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

Cleanspark has a beta of 4.359, which suggesting that the stock is 335.937% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cleanspark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleanspark pays -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleanspark quarterly revenues are $181.7M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. Cleanspark's net income of -$138.8M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, Cleanspark's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.91x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 47.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleanspark is 4.46x versus 9.88x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hut 8 has a net margin of -76.38% compared to Cleanspark's net margin of 44.79%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.15% beat Hut 8's return on equity of -6.47%.

Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.56%. On the other hand Hut 8 has an analysts' consensus of $25.40 which suggests that it could grow by 63.45%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than Hut 8, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than Hut 8.

Cleanspark has a beta of 4.359, which suggesting that the stock is 335.937% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hut 8 has a beta of 4.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 315.265%.

Cleanspark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hut 8 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleanspark pays -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Hut 8 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleanspark quarterly revenues are $181.7M, which are larger than Hut 8 quarterly revenues of -$90.6M. Cleanspark's net income of -$138.8M is lower than Hut 8's net income of -$133.9M. Notably, Cleanspark's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.91x while Hut 8's PE ratio is 4.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleanspark is 4.46x versus 6.09x for Hut 8. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -76.38% compared to Cleanspark's net margin of -249.29%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.15% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of -10.39%.

Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.56%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.27 which suggests that it could grow by 36.4%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

Cleanspark has a beta of 4.359, which suggesting that the stock is 335.937% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 6.822, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 582.181%.

Cleanspark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleanspark pays -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleanspark quarterly revenues are $181.7M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $213.9M. Cleanspark's net income of -$138.8M is higher than MARA Holdings's net income of -$533.2M. Notably, Cleanspark's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.91x while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleanspark is 4.46x versus 6.94x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -76.38% compared to Cleanspark's net margin of -183.64%. Cleanspark's return on equity of -11.15% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

Cleanspark has a consensus price target of $19.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.56%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.40 which suggests that it could grow by 83.77%. Given that Cleanspark has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe Cleanspark is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Cleanspark has a beta of 4.359, which suggesting that the stock is 335.937% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.747, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 374.659%.

Cleanspark has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleanspark pays -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleanspark quarterly revenues are $181.7M, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. Cleanspark's net income of -$138.8M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, Cleanspark's price-to-earnings ratio is 78.91x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleanspark is 4.46x versus 5.60x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.