FTEK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of 1.02% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of 1.54%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -1.37% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 5.03%.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 284.62%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.41%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than CECO Environmental.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.099, which suggesting that the stock is 309.928% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.409, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.912%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $7.9M, which are smaller than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $135.5M. Fuel Tech's net income of $80K is lower than CECO Environmental's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 88.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 1.22x versus 1.92x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson has a net margin of 1.02% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of 11%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -1.37% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 29.12%.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 284.62%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $75.83 which suggests that it could grow by 11.67%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Donaldson.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.099, which suggesting that the stock is 309.928% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.206%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $7.9M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $900.1M. Fuel Tech's net income of $80K is lower than Donaldson's net income of $99M. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Donaldson's PE ratio is 19.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 1.22x versus 2.28x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a net margin of 1.02% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of --. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -1.37% beat Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of --.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 284.62%. On the other hand Kronos Advanced Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6718.18%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than Fuel Tech, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than Fuel Tech.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.099, which suggesting that the stock is 309.928% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of -1.404, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 240.431%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kronos Advanced Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $7.9M, which are larger than Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Fuel Tech's net income of $80K is higher than Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kronos Advanced Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 1.22x versus -- for Kronos Advanced Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 1.02% compared to Fuel Tech's net margin of 5.59%. Fuel Tech's return on equity of -1.37% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 20.67%.

Fuel Tech has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 284.62%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.58%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.099, which suggesting that the stock is 309.928% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.932%.

Fuel Tech has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fuel Tech pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fuel Tech quarterly revenues are $7.9M, which are smaller than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.9M. Fuel Tech's net income of $80K is lower than Limbach Holdings's net income of $7.5M. Notably, Fuel Tech's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 40.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fuel Tech is 1.22x versus 2.04x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.