LE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a net margin of -3.16% compared to Lands' End's net margin of -9.82%. Lands' End's return on equity of 1.91% beat Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38%.

Lands' End has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 71.67%. On the other hand Big 5 Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 287.93%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Lands' End, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Lands' End.

Lands' End has a beta of 2.450, which suggesting that the stock is 144.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.468%.

Lands' End has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Big 5 Sporting Goods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Lands' End pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays out -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Lands' End quarterly revenues are $261.2M, which are larger than Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $175.6M. Lands' End's net income of -$8.3M is higher than Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Lands' End's price-to-earnings ratio is 71.69x while Big 5 Sporting Goods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lands' End is 0.22x versus 0.03x for Big 5 Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chewy has a net margin of -3.16% compared to Lands' End's net margin of 2%. Lands' End's return on equity of 1.91% beat Chewy's return on equity of 97.54%.

Lands' End has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 71.67%. On the other hand Chewy has an analysts' consensus of $44.99 which suggests that it could grow by 7.35%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Chewy, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Chewy.

Lands' End has a beta of 2.450, which suggesting that the stock is 144.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chewy has a beta of 1.747, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.68%.

Lands' End has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chewy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lands' End pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chewy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lands' End quarterly revenues are $261.2M, which are smaller than Chewy quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Lands' End's net income of -$8.3M is lower than Chewy's net income of $62.4M. Notably, Lands' End's price-to-earnings ratio is 71.69x while Chewy's PE ratio is 47.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lands' End is 0.22x versus 1.48x for Chewy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Five Below has a net margin of -3.16% compared to Lands' End's net margin of 4.24%. Lands' End's return on equity of 1.91% beat Five Below's return on equity of 15.53%.

Lands' End has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 71.67%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $130.11 which suggests that it could grow by 5.48%. Given that Lands' End has higher upside potential than Five Below, analysts believe Lands' End is more attractive than Five Below.

Lands' End has a beta of 2.450, which suggesting that the stock is 144.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.249%.

Lands' End has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lands' End pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lands' End quarterly revenues are $261.2M, which are smaller than Five Below quarterly revenues of $970.5M. Lands' End's net income of -$8.3M is lower than Five Below's net income of $41.1M. Notably, Lands' End's price-to-earnings ratio is 71.69x while Five Below's PE ratio is 25.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lands' End is 0.22x versus 1.69x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

1-800-Flowers.com has a net margin of -3.16% compared to Lands' End's net margin of -53.78%. Lands' End's return on equity of 1.91% beat 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -38.44%.

Lands' End has a consensus price target of $16.00, signalling upside risk potential of 71.67%. On the other hand 1-800-Flowers.com has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 75.78%. Given that 1-800-Flowers.com has higher upside potential than Lands' End, analysts believe 1-800-Flowers.com is more attractive than Lands' End.

Lands' End has a beta of 2.450, which suggesting that the stock is 144.957% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.486, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.614%.

Lands' End has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-Flowers.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lands' End pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-Flowers.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lands' End quarterly revenues are $261.2M, which are smaller than 1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues of $331.5M. Lands' End's net income of -$8.3M is higher than 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of -$178.2M. Notably, Lands' End's price-to-earnings ratio is 71.69x while 1-800-Flowers.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lands' End is 0.22x versus 0.19x for 1-800-Flowers.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.