BGFV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citi Trends has a net margin of -9.82% compared to Big 5 Sporting Goods's net margin of 0.43%. Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38% beat Citi Trends's return on equity of -30.21%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 219.15%. On the other hand Citi Trends has an analysts' consensus of $38.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.17%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Citi Trends, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Citi Trends.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.037, which suggesting that the stock is 103.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citi Trends has a beta of 1.977, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.705%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citi Trends offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Citi Trends pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $175.6M, which are smaller than Citi Trends quarterly revenues of $201.7M. Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M is lower than Citi Trends's net income of $871K. Notably, Big 5 Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Citi Trends's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Big 5 Sporting Goods is 0.04x versus 0.36x for Citi Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Envela has a net margin of -9.82% compared to Big 5 Sporting Goods's net margin of 5.17%. Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38% beat Envela's return on equity of 14.21%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 219.15%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 53.97%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Envela, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Envela.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.037, which suggesting that the stock is 103.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.122, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.8%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $175.6M, which are larger than Envela quarterly revenues of $48.3M. Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M is lower than Envela's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Big 5 Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envela's PE ratio is 22.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Big 5 Sporting Goods is 0.04x versus 0.85x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kirkland's has a net margin of -9.82% compared to Big 5 Sporting Goods's net margin of -14.51%. Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38% beat Kirkland's's return on equity of -1677.68%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 219.15%. On the other hand Kirkland's has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could fall by -12.28%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Kirkland's, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Kirkland's.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.037, which suggesting that the stock is 103.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kirkland's has a beta of 2.381, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.059%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kirkland's offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Kirkland's pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $175.6M, which are larger than Kirkland's quarterly revenues of $81.5M. Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M is lower than Kirkland's's net income of -$11.8M. Notably, Big 5 Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kirkland's's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Big 5 Sporting Goods is 0.04x versus 0.04x for Kirkland's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O'Reilly Automotive has a net margin of -9.82% compared to Big 5 Sporting Goods's net margin of 13.02%. Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38% beat O'Reilly Automotive's return on equity of --.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 219.15%. On the other hand O'Reilly Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $97.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.47%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than O'Reilly Automotive, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than O'Reilly Automotive.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.037, which suggesting that the stock is 103.727% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O'Reilly Automotive has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.829%.

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. O'Reilly Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend. O'Reilly Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues are $175.6M, which are smaller than O'Reilly Automotive quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M is lower than O'Reilly Automotive's net income of $538.5M. Notably, Big 5 Sporting Goods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while O'Reilly Automotive's PE ratio is 33.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Big 5 Sporting Goods is 0.04x versus 4.69x for O'Reilly Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.