BARK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Envela has a net margin of -5.26% compared to BARK's net margin of 5.17%. BARK's return on equity of -27.24% beat Envela's return on equity of 14.21%.

BARK has a consensus price target of $2.33, signalling upside risk potential of 166.73%. On the other hand Envela has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 59.13%. Given that BARK has higher upside potential than Envela, analysts believe BARK is more attractive than Envela.

BARK has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Envela has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.591%.

BARK has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Envela offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BARK pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Envela pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BARK quarterly revenues are $115.4M, which are larger than Envela quarterly revenues of $48.3M. BARK's net income of -$6.1M is lower than Envela's net income of $2.5M. Notably, BARK's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Envela's PE ratio is 21.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BARK is 0.32x versus 0.82x for Envela. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Five Below has a net margin of -5.26% compared to BARK's net margin of 4.24%. BARK's return on equity of -27.24% beat Five Below's return on equity of 15.53%.

BARK has a consensus price target of $2.33, signalling upside risk potential of 166.73%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $130.11 which suggests that it could grow by 3.28%. Given that BARK has higher upside potential than Five Below, analysts believe BARK is more attractive than Five Below.

BARK has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.249%.

BARK has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BARK pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BARK quarterly revenues are $115.4M, which are smaller than Five Below quarterly revenues of $970.5M. BARK's net income of -$6.1M is lower than Five Below's net income of $41.1M. Notably, BARK's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Five Below's PE ratio is 26.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BARK is 0.32x versus 1.72x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lands' End has a net margin of -5.26% compared to BARK's net margin of -3.16%. BARK's return on equity of -27.24% beat Lands' End's return on equity of 1.91%.

BARK has a consensus price target of $2.33, signalling upside risk potential of 166.73%. On the other hand Lands' End has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 69.13%. Given that BARK has higher upside potential than Lands' End, analysts believe BARK is more attractive than Lands' End.

BARK has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lands' End has a beta of 2.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.957%.

BARK has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lands' End offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BARK pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lands' End pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BARK quarterly revenues are $115.4M, which are smaller than Lands' End quarterly revenues of $261.2M. BARK's net income of -$6.1M is higher than Lands' End's net income of -$8.3M. Notably, BARK's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lands' End's PE ratio is 72.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BARK is 0.32x versus 0.22x for Lands' End. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Victoria's Secret & has a net margin of -5.26% compared to BARK's net margin of -0.12%. BARK's return on equity of -27.24% beat Victoria's Secret &'s return on equity of 33.08%.

BARK has a consensus price target of $2.33, signalling upside risk potential of 166.73%. On the other hand Victoria's Secret & has an analysts' consensus of $22.09 which suggests that it could grow by 12.89%. Given that BARK has higher upside potential than Victoria's Secret &, analysts believe BARK is more attractive than Victoria's Secret &.

BARK has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Victoria's Secret & has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BARK has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Victoria's Secret & offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BARK pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Victoria's Secret & pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BARK quarterly revenues are $115.4M, which are smaller than Victoria's Secret & quarterly revenues of $1.4B. BARK's net income of -$6.1M is lower than Victoria's Secret &'s net income of -$1.7M. Notably, BARK's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Victoria's Secret &'s PE ratio is 9.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BARK is 0.32x versus 0.26x for Victoria's Secret &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.